KNOWLEDGE IN THE CONCEPT OF NATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS IN THE ERA OF THE FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION

Authors

  • Vladimir Stojanović Niš, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/kij4701045s

Keywords:

national competitiveness, fourth industrial revolution, economic growth, total factor productivity

Abstract

The economic development of countries and regional economic integrations in this century is accompanied by increasing openness and growing production and trade competitiveness of national economies in the world market. In short, the level of national competitiveness determines the ability of its institutions to shape the conditions conducive to business promotion, on the one hand, and the potential of domestic firms to take advantage of such conditions and place products on the world market, on the other. Dynamic economic growth means that companies and countries are increasingly promoting the improvement of trade competitiveness on the world market on the commercial valorization of existing and new knowledge into innovations. Strengthening innovation capacity helps countries accelerate the process of structural change and thus create conditions for dynamic economic growth, which is in the function of improving national competitiveness in the increasingly complex and demanding conditions of global business and competition. The fact is, however, that satisfactory economic development, which is based on the growth of competitiveness, fails to be achieved by all countries. Viewed in that light, the fourth industrial revolution as a phenomenon that dominates modern economic events in the world, opened new possibilities, but at the same time led to the strengthening of many imbalances, one of the expressive forms of which is the growing development gap between individual national economies.

After forty years of experience in monitoring and comparing the factors of long-term competitiveness of countries, in 2018, the World Economic Forum promoted the Global Competitiveness Index 4.0. The index provides a detailed overview of the key drivers of economic growth and human development indicators in the era of the fourth industrial revolution. As an indicator of national competitiveness, the index is adjusted to the description of real events in business and the overall life of people that are shaped by the phenomenon of the fourth industrial revolution. The concept is based on the observation of the increase of real national production enabled by the growth of consumption of factors of production and total factor productivity as a measure of efficiency in the use of factors based on the commercialization of new knowledge and skills in innovation. Thus conceived, the Global Competitiveness Index 4.0. is a kind of indicator of the factors that determine economic growth and social development in the era of the fourth industrial revolution. It is an annual indicator that enables economic policy makers to assess their progress in a number of areas that determine national competitiveness in today's economic conditions. All indicators that make up the Global Competitiveness Index 4.0 are organized into 12 pillars: Institutions; Infrastructure; Application of ICT; Macroeconomic stability; Health; Skills; Product market; Job market; Financial system; Market size; Business dynamics; and Innovation Capability.

References

Balcerzak, A. P. & Pietrzak, M. B. (2016). Quality of Institutions for Knowledgebased Economy within New Institutional Economics Framework. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for European Countries in the Years 2000-2013. Economics and Sociology, 9(4), 66-81.

Gavurova, B., Vagasova, T., & Kovac, V. (2016). Competitiveness Assessment of Slovak Republic Regions. 13 th International Scientific Conference of the European Financial Systems, Brno, Czech Republic, 175-184.

Giedraitis, A., Stasys, R., & Skirpstaite, R. (2017). Management team development opportunities: a case of Lithuanian furniture company. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(2), 212-222.

Habanik, J., Kordos, M., & Hostak, P. (2016). Competitiveness of Slovak economy and regional development policies. Journal of International Studies, 9 (1), 144-155.

Hadad, S. (2015). Analytic hierarchy process analysis for choosing a corporate social entrepreneurship strategy. Management & Marketing, 10(3), 185-207

Kaynak, S., Altuntas, S., & Dereli, T. (2017). Comparing the innovation performance of EU candidate countries: an entropy-based TOPSIS approach. Economic Research, 30(1), 31-54

Schwab, K. (2021). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019, Geneva: World Economic Forum.

Schwab, K. (2020). The Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

Schwab, K. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019, Geneva: World Economic Forum.

Vojtovic, S. (2016).The Impact of The Structural Funds on Competitiveness of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(4), 30-45.

OECD. (2017). Global Economic Outlook. (2017). Prеuzеtо sа: http://www.oecd.org/eco/ outlook/ sources-and-methods.html.

World Economic Forum (2014) The Future of Manufacturing: Driving Capabilities, Enabling Investments. Dоstupnо nа: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/Media/GAC14/Future_of_Manufacturing_Driving_Capabilities.pdf, [13.05.2021]

Downloads

Published

2021-08-16

How to Cite

Stojanović, V. (2021). KNOWLEDGE IN THE CONCEPT OF NATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS IN THE ERA OF THE FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 47(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.35120/kij4701045s