• Veselin Chantov Department of Comprehensive Studies, University of Library Studies and Information Technologies Sofia
Keywords: early foreign language learning, structural and functional model


At the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century, the question of early foreign language learning (EFLL) is on the agenda because of the changed economic, political and social conditions in human life. There is a clear tendency to lower the age limit for starting training in relation to the general trend of early childhood development in the family and in the society. Traditional views are changed because the child’s inclusion in the foreign language culture from a young age develops language skills, forms the beginnings of a secondary language personality, promotes the development of the intellect, the development of all psychic processes, which in the long run will help that person become socially successful. In the world of learning a foreign language, age is a particularly debated subject. In language learning, EFLL should correspond to the process of natural learning of the mother tongue. The article makes an in-depth and impartial analysis of the arguments for and against the acquisition of a EFLL, citing research by prominent scientists in the field. The most serious arguments in the main thematic studies are examined, with the relevant conclusions drawn and the outline of the positive and negative aspects of the application of early foreign language teaching methods. On the basis of this psychological-pedagogical analysis, the term EFLL is defined as the unity of the cognitive, cultural and emotional components, namely: the development of the child from the earliest age of elementary foreign language skills, most of the time receptive ones; inclusion in foreign language culture; development of the child’s personal qualities with specially organized classes such as: curiosity, responsiveness, willingness to cooperate, development of psychic processes (phonemic hearing, attention, perception, thinking, memory, sensory sphere). EFLL up to 3 years is conducive to the beginning of language learning, it is a tool for developing the child’s creative thinking, memory and imagination. The most important for such training is the criteria for: accessibility, consideration of the needs and interests of children, communication. The process of language learning for children up to the age of 3 becomes effective within a structural and functional model developed on the basis of system, activity, and media approaches. This model has 4 interconnected and interdependent blocks - targeted, meaningful, organizational and efficient. Some common methods of the organizational model block applicable to EFLL (Glen Doman, Makoto Shichida, Maria Montessori, Masaru Ibuka) have been analyzed.


Chantov, V. On the Structure of Some Methods of Early Foreign Language Learning, Inovacionnie Procesi v Nacionalnoy Ekonomike I Socialno-gumanitarnoy sfere, Belgorod,2008, ch.1, s.6-9.

Chriswick, B.R., P.W. Miller. The Critical Period Hypothesis for Language Learning: What the 2000 US Census Says. IZA Discussion Paper Series. (IZA DP No. 2575.) Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor, 2007.

Fridman, D. Kak Razvit Talant Rebenka ot Rozhdeniya do 5 Let, M.,1995, 240 s.

Hakuta, K. Degree of Bilingualism and Cognitive Ability in Mainland Puerto Rican Children. Child Development, Vol. 58:5. Madison: Blackwell Publishing, 1987. pp. 1372–1388.

Johnstone, R. Addressing ‘The Age Factor’: Some Implications for Language Policy. Guide for the

development of Language Education Policies in Europe From Linguistic Diversity to Plurilingual Education:

Reference Study, Stirling:University of Stirling. 2002.

King, K., Mackey, A. The Bilingual Edge: why, when and how to teach your child a second language. New York: Collins, an imprint of HarperCollins Publishers, 2007.

Kormi-Nouri, R., Moniri, S., Nilsson, L. Episodic and Semantic Memory in Bilingual and Monolingual Children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 44:1. Bergen: University of Bergen, 2003. pp. 47-54.

LIGHT http:/www.light-europe.eu/project_beschreibung.php

Mescheryakova, V. Effektivniy Kurs Angliyskogo dlya Detey, I Love English, M. 2003.

Milloy, M., Fisher, L. To Learn a Language. NEA Today, Vol. 21:1. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 2002. p. 22.

Montessori, M. The Montessori Method, New York: Schocken Books, 1964.

Pehlivanova, P. Zashto Ranno Chuzhdoezikovo Obuchenie? Predpostavki na Detskata Vazrast, Problemi na rannoto Chuzhdoezikovo Obuchenie, V. Tarnovo, 2004.

Scoval, Th. Critical Review of the Critical Period Research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 20, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. pp. 213–223.

Spiridonova, A.V. Metodika Aktivizacii Detey Rannego Vozrasta (2-3 goda) v Usloviyah Iskustvennoy Yazikovoy Sredi, Aktualnie Voprosi Sovremennoy auki, Novosibirsk: ZPHS, Izd. SIBPRINT, 2008, V.4, kn.1, s.219-225.

Stewart, J.H. Foreign Language Study in Elementary Schools: Benefits and Implications for Achievement in Reading and Math. Early Childhood Education Journal, Vol. 33:1. Dordrecht, New York, Cambridge: Springer, Inc., 2005.13

Stowe, L. A., Sabourin, L. Imaging the Processing of a Second Language: Effects of Maturation and Proficiency on the Neural Processes Involved. International 12 Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, Vol.43. Berlin: De Kruyper Verlag GmbH & Co., 2005. pp. 329–353.

Uylings, H.B.M. Development of the Human Cortex and the Concept of ‘Critical’ or ‘Sensitive’ Periods. The cognitive neuroscience of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.

Yanakiev, M. Edin Ezik, Dva Ezika, Tri Ezika, Chuzhdoezikovo Obuchenie, kn.3-4.

How to Cite
Chantov, V. (2018). EARLY FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING – METHODOLOGY ASPECTS. Knowledge International Journal, 22(6), 1469 - 1474. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/KIJ/article/view/2829