• Flora Kadriu
Keywords: tolerance, integration, dialogue, liberal democracy


The motif behind this paper is to explore the issue related to tolerance, integration and dialogue, which represent dynamic principles of multiculturalism, especially the liberal multiculturalism. From a historical perspective, liberalism and tolerance are closely related, but their connection is also a conceptual one.
Many debates about tolerance have dealt with its scope and boundaries. This is often related to different attitudes about the moral grounds or justification of tolerance.
Among the influential arguments put forward in favour of tolerance are the ones to invoke the principles of unity, neutrality and regard for individuals. The principles of neutrality and regard for individuals are gaining salience especially in recent liberal theories on the proper role of the state. These principles seek that the state be neutral in the same sense among the various concepts of good held and followed by its citizens.
Without ever abandoning the care for individual rights and freedoms, liberalism should insist on harmonising freedom with equality and community. If liberalism should ever have a chance of establishing itself in countries with polyethnic structures, it must explicitly meet the needs and aspirations of ethnic and national minorities.
Besides integration and tolerance, dialogue is a dynamic principle of liberal democracy. It is considered to be the bloodline of the institutional system in multicultural societies and countries, and therefore, the dialogue led among cultural groups or their political elite is one of the most prominent topics.


Barry B., “Kultura I jednakost: egalitarna kritika multikulturalizma”, Naklada Jesenski i Turk, Zagreb, 2006. Joseph Raz, “The Morality of Freedom”, Oxford: Calendon Press, 1986.

Kukathas C., “The Fraternal Conceit: Individualist versus Collectivist Ideas of Community” (Centre for Independent Studies, St Leonard’s), 1991.

Kymlicka W., “Multicultural Odysseys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity”, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

KymlickaW., “Multicultural Citizenship”, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995, p. 158.

KymlickaW., “Multicultural Citizenship”, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995, p. 165.

Mendes S., “Toleration and the Limits of Liberalism” (Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ), 1989, p. 56.

Miller D., "Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Thought", MI-AN, Skopje, 2002, pg. 452 - 455.

Parekht B., “Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory”, Palgrave, New York, 2000.

Rawls J., “A Theory of Justice”, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, 1971.

Rawls J., “Justice as Faimess: Political and Metaphysical “, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1985, 14 /24.

Rawls J., “Justice as Fairness: Political and Metaphysical“, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1985, 14 / 3:241.

Rawls J., “The Idea of an Overlapping Concensus“, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1987, 7 / 1: 4.

Raz J.,” Multiculturalism: A liberal perspective”, in: Joseph Raz , “Ethics in the Public Domain”, New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.

Sandel M., “Freedom of Conscience or Freedom of Choice“, in James Hunter and O. Guinness (eds.), Articles of Faith, Articles of Peace (Brookings Institute, Washington, DC), 1990, 74 – 92.

How to Cite
Kadriu, F. (2019). TOLERANCE, INTEGRATION AND DIALOGUE AS DYNAMIC PRINCIPLES OF LIBERAL MULTICULTURALISM. Knowledge International Journal, 30(5), 1325 - 1330. Retrieved from