ASSESSMENT OF THE CONTROL OF THE STRAY DOG POPULATION

Authors

  • Miglena Kolarova - Dimitrova Faculty of Public Health, Medical University - Varna, Bulgaria

Keywords:

animal shelters, stray animals, zoonoses, main challenges

Abstract

The world's domestic dog population is estimated at approximately 700 million, with about 75% classified as "stray". Stray dogs are free to roam and breed, thus creating large, difficult-to-control populations. Free-roaming dogs pose a threat to local wildlife and public health, including the transmission of a number of zoonotic pathogens to domestic animals and humans, attacks on animals and humans, and traffic accidents. The purpose of this study is to assess the control of the population of stray dogs in Varna for a period of 5 years (2017-2021) by analyzing the activities of the Municipal Shelter for Stray Animals (MSSA). Approaches to managing dog populations include killing, fertility control and shelter keeping. The municipal shelter in the city of Varna is having a hard time dealing with the stray dog population due to poor funding and lack of staff. For the monitored period there is a lasting tendency to reduce the number of stray animals caught in the Municipal Shelter. There is a significant difference between captured and neutered dogs. A similar difference is found in vaccination and deworming of stray dogs. Adoption and euthanasia of stray animals as practices for controlling the population of this species are not popular in Bulgaria. Dog population management is a multifaceted concept that aims to improve the health and well-being of stray dogs, reduce the problems they can cause and reduce the size of the dog population. Held in many countries around the world. It is performed by different groups with different methods according to different types of populations using different various indicators for assessing the impact of interventions. Understanding the effectiveness of each of these interventions is important to guide the future management of the dog population. Very few of the studies reviewed allowed correct conclusions to be drawn. The main challenges for future research on the problem are to assess the feasibility, effectiveness, sustainability and effects of mass campaigns to control the stray dog population.

Author Biography

Miglena Kolarova - Dimitrova, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University - Varna, Bulgaria

Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology

References

Barnard, S., Pedernera, C., Candeloro, L., Ferri, N., Velarde, A., & Dalla Villa, P.(2015). Development of a new welfare assessment protocol for practical application in long-term dog shelters. Vet. Rec. 2015;178:2–8

Dalla Villa, P., Kahn, S., Stuardo, L., Iannetti, L., Di Nardo, A., & Serpell, J.A. (2010). Free-roaming dog control among OIE-member countries. Prev. Vet. Med.;97:58–63

Cvetkova, T., Stoyanova, K., & Paunov, T. (2018). Journal of IMAB–Annual Proceeding Scientific Papers, Contamination with Toxocara spp. eggs of environmental samples of public places of Varna city, Bulgaria

Gamble, L., Gibson, A.D., Shervell, K., Lohr, F., Otter, I., & Mellanby, R. J. (2018).The problem of stray dogs PMID: 30747127, DOI: 10.20506/rst.37.2.2822 Rev Sci Tech 2018 Aug;37(2):543- 550. doi: 10.20506/rst.37.2.2822.

Garde, E., & Acosta-Jamett, G.(2014). BM Bronsvoort Review of the risks of some canine zoonoses from free-roaming dogs in the post-disaster setting of Latin America. Animals. 2013;3:855–865 , Gompper M.E. The Dog-Human-Wildlife Interface: Assessing the Scope of the Problem. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2014

Garde, E., Marín-Vial, P., Pérez, G.E., & Sandvig, E.M.(2022). A Review and Analysis of the National Dog Population Management Program in Chile. Animals (Basel), 2022 Jan 19;12(3):228. doi: 10.3390/ani12030228.PMID: 35158553

Hampson, K., Coudeville, L., Lembo, T., Sambo, M., Kieffer, A., Attlan, M., Barrat, J., Blanton, J.D., Briggs, D.J., & Cleaveland, S. (2015). Estimating the global burden of endemic canine rabies. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015;9:1–20

Hogasen, H.R., Er, C., Di Nardo, A., Dalla Villa, P., Høgåsen, H., Er, C., Di Nardo, A., & Villa, P.D. (2013.) Free-roaming dog populations: A cost-benefit model for different management options, applied to Abruzzo, Italy. Prev. Vet. Med.;112:401–413

Hu, C.H., Yu, P.H., Kang, C.L., Chen, H.L., & Yen, S.C. (2019). Demography and welfare status of free-roaming dogs in Yangmingshan National Park, Taiwan.Prev Vet Med. 2019 May 1;166:49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 11.PMID: 30935505

Kisiel, L. (2017). Master’s Thesis. The University of Guelph; Guelph, ON, Canada Using a dog demography field study to inform the development of an agent based computer simulation. Evaluating owned dog population control interventions in a small, semi-urban community in Mexico , 96

Kolarova – Dimitrova, M. (2022). Коларова – Димитрова М. Бяс Предизвикателството, Стено 2022, с. 163, ISBN 978-619-241-206-7

Macpherson, C. (2013). The epidemiology and public health importance of toxocariasis: A zoonosis of global importance. Int. J. Parasitol ;43:999–1008

Massei, G., & Miller, L.A. (2013). Nonsurgical fertility control for managing free-roaming dog populations: a review of products and criteria for field applications.Theriogenology. 2013 Nov;80(8):829-38. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.07.016. Epub 2013 Aug 30.PMID: 23998740

Meslin, F., Miles, M., Vexenat, A., & Gemmell, M. (2000). Zoonoses control in dogs. In: Macpherson C.N.L., Meslin F.X., Wandeler A.I., editors. Dogs, Zoonoses and Public Health. CABI Publishing; New York, NY, USA: 2000. pp. 333–372

Quinnell, R. (2009). Parasitology O.C. Transmission, reservoir hosts and control of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis. Parasitology ;135:1915–1934

Smith, L.M., Hartmann, S., Munteanu, A.M., Dalla Villa, P., Quinnell, R.J., & Collins, L.M. (2019). The Effectiveness of Dog Population Management: A Systematic Review. Animals , 9, 1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9121020

Spehar, D.D., & Wolf, P.J. (2020). The Impact of Return-to-Field and Targeted Trap-Neuter-Return on Feline Intake and Euthanasia at a Municipal Animal Shelter in Jefferson County, Kentucky. Animals (Basel). 2020 Aug 11;10(8):1395. doi: 10.3390/ani10081395.PMID: 32796681

Shamsaddini, S., Ahmadi Gohari, M., Kamyabi, H., Nasibi, S., Derakhshani, A., Mohammadi, M.A., Mousavi, S.M., Baneshi, M.R., Hiby, E., & Harandi, M.F. (2022). Dynamic modeling of female neutering interventions for free-roaming dog population management in an urban setting of southeastern Iran. Mar 21;12(1):4781. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08697-w.PMID: 35314736

Tasker, L. (2007). Stray Animal Control Practices (Europe) WSPA and RSPCA; London, UK: 2007, https://www.rspca.org.uk/documents/1494939/0/Stray+dog+and+cat+control+practices+in+Europe+%28WSPA-RSPCA2007%29.pdf/ca537209-64e2-881a-b36d-6abd3795679d?t=1556901393627

Taylor, L.H., Wallace, R.M., Balaram, D., Lindenmayer, J.M., Eckery, D.C., Mutonono-Watkiss, B., Parravani, E., Nel, L.H. (2017). Front Vet Sci. Jul 10;4:109. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00109. eCollection 2017.PMID: 28740850 The Role of Dog Population Management in Rabies Elimination-A Review of Current Approaches and Future Opportunities.

Yoak, A.J., Reece, J.F., Gehrt, S.D., & Hamilton, I.M. (2016). Optimizing free-roaming dog control programs using agent-based models. Ecol. Modell.;341:53–61

Downloads

Published

2022-05-30

How to Cite

Kolarova - Dimitrova, M. (2022). ASSESSMENT OF THE CONTROL OF THE STRAY DOG POPULATION. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 52(4), 615–619. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/5233