COVID-19 VACCINE HESITANCY IN INDIVIDUALISTIC AND COLLECTIVISTIC CULTURES

Authors

  • Hristina Sokolova Republic of Bulgaria, “Angel Kanchev” University of Ruse, Faculty of Business and Management
  • Nikola Sabev Republic of Bulgaria, “Angel Kanchev” University of Ruse, Faculty of Public Health and Healthcare

Keywords:

vaccine hesitancy, individualism, collectivism, COVID-19

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is a worldwide phenomenon rooted in cultural beliefs and perceptions of health and
sickness. The paper presents an exploratory analysis of available scientific research that investigates COVID-19
vaccine hesitancy in global cultures. The cultural aspects are based on Hofstede’s model of cultural dimensions,
which incorporates individualism and collectivism. We believe that cultures in these dimensions would show a
proclivity to reject or accept vaccinations and their influence on the human body. The paper also discusses the basic
notions of vaccine trust and vaccine hesitancy and the role of vaccination policies and public health strategies to
fight the disease. The text also discusses different interpretations of vaccine hesitancy, such as a lack of collective
empathy.
The present research employs three hypotheses. First, populations in individualistic cultures around the world are
more likely to choose vaccinations as a form of protection (high interpersonal empathy outside of the family unit,
high degree of public responsibility and awareness). Second, populations in collectivistic cultures are more likely to
reject vaccinations as a form of protection (low degree of interpersonal empathy outside of the family unit, low
degree of public responsibility and awareness). Third, populations in both groups of cultures make their vaccination
choices based on consuming messages from strategic communications used to popularize COVID-19 vaccinations.
Research methods include the descriptive and deductive analysis of hypotheses. A secondary deductive analysis is
provided to classify vaccine hesitancy as an individualistic or collectivistic trait.
Hypotheses are based on the premise that there is a cultural difference in the degree of public responsibility and
awareness and in interpersonal empathy outside of the family unit. This is based on some authors’ consideration of
intrinsic motivation as a result of affiliation with an individualistic or collectivistic group.
The paper attempts to understand the link between individualism and collectivism as cultural value orientations and
vaccine confidence. We conclude that Western cultures have cultural aspects that are similar to individualism,
whereas Eastern cultures are more similar to collectivism. However, we cannot find a direct connection between
individualism and collectivism as cultural dimensions and the personal choice to vaccinate against COVID-19
because the available data does not support that. The authors believe that the socio-cultural, political, and economic
environments have a stronger influence on people’s proclivity to vaccinate. Media messages remain key to
addressing vaccine hesitancy according to cultural norms and perceptions.

References

Панайотов, К. (2021). COVID-19 и актуални проблеми в здравната политика на ЕС. Сп. Здравни грижи, бр. 4, стр. 28-32.

Abusalem, S., Abuhammad, S., Sha, S., Martinez Mar, M., Aljeesh, Y., & Eldeirawi, K. M. (2022). Intentions to receive COVID-19 vaccination among people in Gaza Strip. Electronic Journal of General Medicine, 19(6), em412. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/12413

Argote, P., Barham, E., Daly, S.Z. et al., (2021), The shot, the message, and the messenger: COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Latin America. npj Vaccines 6, 118 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-021-00380-x

Bartoš, V., Bauer, M., Cahlíková, J. et al. Communicating doctors’ consensus persistently increases COVID-19 vaccinations. Nature 606, 542–549 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04805-y

Curry, O. S. (2016) “Morality as cooperation: A problem-centred approach” in The Evolution of Morality, T. K. Shackelford, R. D. Hansen, Eds. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 27–51.

Dubé, Е., D. Gagnon, E. Nickels, S. Jeram, M. Schuster (2014). Mapping vaccine hesitancy—Country-specific characteristics of a global phenomenon. Vaccine No. 32, pp. 6649–6654, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.039

Goodwin, R., Ben-Ezra, M., Takahashi, M. et al. (2022). Psychological factors underpinning vaccine willingness in Israel, Japan and Hungary. Sci Rep 12, 439 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03986-2

Hagger, M. S., Rentzelas, P., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2014). Effects of individualist and collectivist group norms and choice on intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(2), 215–223. doi: 10.1007/s11031-013-9373-2

Jarrett, C., Wilson, R., O'Leary, M., Eckersberger, E., Larson, H. J., & SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy (2015). Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy - A systematic review. Vaccine, 33(34), 4180–4190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.040

Korn, L. & R. Böhm, N. W. Meier, C. Betsch (2020). Vaccination as a social contract. PNAS. 117 (26) 14890-14899 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919666117, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1919666117

Larson, H. J., Jarrett, C., Eckersberger, E., Smith, D. M. & Paterson, P. (2014). Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: a systematic review of published literature, 2007–2012. Vaccine 32, 2150–2159

Larson, H. J., Jarrett, C., Schulz, W. S., Chaudhuri, M., Zhou, Y., Dube, E., Schuster, M., MacDonald, N. E., Wilson, R., & SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy (2015). Measuring vaccine hesitancy: The development of a survey tool. Vaccine, 33(34), 4165–4175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.037

Lazarus, J.V., Wyka, K., White, T.M. et al. (2022). Revisiting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy around the world using data from 23 countries in 2021. Nat Commun 13, 3801 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31441-x

Leonhardt, J. M., & Pezzuti, T. (2022). Vaccination Acceptance Across Cultures: The Roles of Collectivism, Empathy, and Homophily. Journal of International Marketing, 30(2), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X211073179

MacDonald, N. E., & SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy (2015). Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine, 33(34), 4161–4164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036

Murphy, J., Vallières, F., Bentall, R.P. et al. (2021). Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom. Nat Commun 12, 29 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20226-9

Solís Arce, J.S., Warren, S.S., Meriggi, N.F. et al. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in low- and middle-income countries. Nat Med 27, 1385–1394 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01454-y

Steinmetz, L. (2022). Sociodemographic predictors of and main reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in eastern Oslo: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 22, 1878 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14261-y

Downloads

Published

2022-12-16

How to Cite

Sokolova, H., & Sabev, N. (2022). COVID-19 VACCINE HESITANCY IN INDIVIDUALISTIC AND COLLECTIVISTIC CULTURES. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 55(6), 1217–1222. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/5850

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>