COMPARISON OF THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF FREE GINGIVAL GRAFT VERSUS MUCOGRAFT IN MUCOGINGIVAL ESTHETIC SURGERY – CYTOLOGICAL EVALUATION

Authors

  • Zaklina Menceva University Dental Clinical Center St. Pantelejmon-Skopje, North Macedonia
  • Aneta Terzievska University Dental Clinical Center St. Pantelejmon-Skopje, North Macedonia
  • Daniela Veleska Stevkovska University Dental Clinical Center St. Pantelejmon-Skopje, North Macedonia
  • Biljana Evrosimovska University Dental Clinical Center St. Pantelejmon-Skopje, North Macedonia
  • Stavre Trajculeski University Dental Clinical Center St. Pantelejmon-Skopje, North Macedonia
  • Biljana Rusevska University Dental Clinical Center St. Pantelejmon-Skopje, North Macedonia

Keywords:

Gingival recession, gingival graft, cytological analysis, graduation index

Abstract

Gingival recession is not a disease, but it is defined as an apical dislocation of the marginal gingiva towards the enamel-cement border, a condition that is conditioned primarily by morphology and structure, poor oral hygiene (rough brushing of the teeth) and eventual functional overload (traumatic occlusion). The aim of this study was to make a cytological verification and comparison in the intervened segment after the application of the two types of graft: free gingival graft and mucograft.
Methodology. With the cytological analysis, the maturation index of the cells was determined by taking a swab with the help of brushes, and the material taken was applied to glass slides that were stained according to the method of Papanikolaou and Gimza, which determined the maturation index, which implies a percentage ratio of basal, parabasal, intermediate and superficial squamous cells, which show us the surface healing of the injured gingiva in relation to the surrounding tissue in both groups of 30 patients who were treated with the same surgical technique but a different membrane.
Results. In the cytological research, the graduation index was determined as a percentage ratio of parabasal, intermediate and superficial, ie squamous cells from smears that were taken postoperatively on the 7th, 14th and 30th day. With multiple linear regression, it was determined that gender and age as parameters together affect the variability of all three types of cells from the graduation index: parabasal, intermediate and superficial, but none of them is a significant predictor of the variability of the finding on day 30 from the intervention. The statistical monitoring of the graduation index in both groups showed that the surface healing of the epithelium was faster in the group of patients who were operated with Mucograft, but without significant significance.
Conclusion. Cytological analysis showed a faster maturation index, a more robust surface healing process in the sample treated with Mucograft, but no significance was registered.
Recommendation and Additional date. Cytological examinations are always recommended as non-invasive methods that are favorable for patients and do not disturb their comfort.

Author Biographies

Zaklina Menceva, University Dental Clinical Center St. Pantelejmon-Skopje, North Macedonia

Department of Oral surgery and Implantology

Aneta Terzievska, University Dental Clinical Center St. Pantelejmon-Skopje, North Macedonia

Department of Oral surgery and Implantology

Daniela Veleska Stevkovska, University Dental Clinical Center St. Pantelejmon-Skopje, North Macedonia

Department of Oral surgery and Implantology

Biljana Evrosimovska, University Dental Clinical Center St. Pantelejmon-Skopje, North Macedonia

Department of Oral surgery and Implantology

Stavre Trajculeski, University Dental Clinical Center St. Pantelejmon-Skopje, North Macedonia

Department of Oral surgery and Implantology

Biljana Rusevska, University Dental Clinical Center St. Pantelejmon-Skopje, North Macedonia

Department for Oral and Periodontal Diseases

References

Alexandrina L. Dumitrescu, (2011). Chemicals in Surgical Periodontal Therapy Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York,

CEJ, (2010)Glossary of Periodontology Terms, AAP,

Joss-Vassalli I, Grebenstein C, Topouzelis N, Sculean A, Katsaros C. (2010) Orthodontic therapy and gingival recession: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac

Zucchelli G., Brini C., (1999) Fattori genetici nell'insorgenza di parodontiti. Dental Cadmos

Ruf S, Hansen K, Pancherz H., (1998) Does orthodontic proclination of lower incisors in children and adolescents cause gingival recession? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J, Sinclair F, Thilander B., (1987) Some periodontal tissue reactions to orthodontic tooth movement in monkeys. J Clin Periodontol

Greif J, Hewitt W, Armstrong ML., (1999) Tattooing and body piercing. Body art practices among college students. Clin Nurs Res

Mayers LB, Judelson DA, Moriarty BW, Rundell KW., (2002) Prevalence of body art (body piercing and tattooing) in university undergraduates and incidence of medical complications. Mayo Clin Proc

Baker DL, Seymour GJ., (1976) The possible pathogenesis of gingival recession. A histological study of induced recession in the rat. J Clin Periodontol.

Martina Stefanini, Matteo Marzadori, Sofia Aroca et al., June (2018) Decision making in root-coverage procedures for the esthetic outcome Periodontology 2000

Mehrotra R., (2013) Oral citology. А concise guide. Springer,

Stavreva A., (1994) Komparativna evaluacija na hirur{kite tehniki za vestibularna ekstenzija na prikrepenata gingiva. Doktorska disertacija, Skopje.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-10

How to Cite

Menceva, Z., Terzievska, A., Veleska Stevkovska, D., Evrosimovska, B., Trajculeski, S., & Rusevska, B. (2023). COMPARISON OF THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF FREE GINGIVAL GRAFT VERSUS MUCOGRAFT IN MUCOGINGIVAL ESTHETIC SURGERY – CYTOLOGICAL EVALUATION. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 61(4), 577–580. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/6455

Most read articles by the same author(s)