COMPARISON OF TWO MODES OF LEARNING ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES BY MEDICAL BACHELORS

Authors

  • Mariya Saykova Medical College at Medical University - Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Keywords:

ESP, online learning, blended learning, comparison, medical bachelors

Abstract

The article aims at making a comparison between two modes of learning English for Specific Purposes– online and blended ones. Teaching specialized English to students at university has always been both challenging and rewarding as it strives to prepare the future specialists for the competitive environment of the Common European market. English for Specific Purposes and its subfield, English for Academic purposes involves a complex network of intertwined components such as problem and task-based language learning, project-driven learning, communicatively oriented learning etc. It requires the usage of many and diverse teaching methods, starting from a change of teaching paradigm – the old ex cathedra method of information provision, typical of traditional approaches, is superseded by a new one, that of the teacher-manager. The new classroom environment necessitates a more individual approach to teaching and a more task-based learning. Students are guided towards working on their own and catering to their own needs in language acquisition. This completely new methodology of English for Specific Purposes was put to the test during the COVID-19 pandemic when physical contact was avoided for fear of being infected and that entailed a completely new way of teacher-student interaction – distant mode learning. Teachers and students alike were forced into this type of learning mode and it definitely showed significant advantages and unthought-of benefits which would not have transpired should the epidemic had not broken out. Two years later with the epidemic of COVID -19 over, the educational establishments all across Europe had gone back to physical attendance, but not without a heated debate over the two modes of learning juxtaposition. Many practitioners and researchers denounced online learning as ill-conceived and handicapping, but there were voices that stood in defense of this type of learning. This paper strives to contribute to this debate by analyzing the results from two consecutive academic years in which learning was done in completely different ways – the first one was in distant learning mode, as the epidemic was raging during that timeframe, while in the second normal, physical attendance was reintroduced due to the end of the pandemic. This return to “normality” did not entail restoration of the old traditional approaches to learning but the incorporation of “blended” learning, a methodology that makes the best use of the old and the new. Blended learning has been around for some time and it insists on the extended use of technology, including tools such as interactive boards, internet-based platforms such as Moodle, Teams, Google Classroom, and approaches such as problem and task-based learning, project-based learning etc. The results from the research show unequivocally that face-to-face interaction in physical presence does not have an alternative yet in terms of effectiveness as far as the speaking skills are concerned. Other skills such as reading, listening and writing proved to be effectively acquired both in distant mode and in physical presence mode of learning. As a whole, blended learning, which involves a great deal of online interaction, proves to be the most efficient way of acquisition in the course in Enlgish for Specific Purposes.

References

Akbarov, A., Gönen, K., & Aydoğan, H. (2018). Students' attitudes toward blended learning in EFL context. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 11(1), 61-68. doi:10.24193/adn.11.1.5.

Ashmara, R. (2020). Teaching English in Virtual Classroom Using WhatsApp During COVID-19 Pandemic. Language and Education Journal, Volume 5, No 1, April 2020.

Banditvilai, C. (2016). Enhancing Students' Language Skills through Blended Learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(3), 220-229

Boettcher, J.V., & Conrad, R.M. (2016). The Online Teaching Survival Guide: Simple and Practical Pedagogical Tips. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA.

Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

Dagnev, Iv. (2019). Strategies and Innovations in Teaching EAP to Medical Bachelors. International Conference on Technics, Technologies and Education ICTTE 2019, October 16-18, 2019, Yambol, Bulgaria, стр. 179 – 183, www.ictte.eu, 2603-445X (online), 1314-9474 (CD/DVD), DOI: 10.15547/ictte.2019.03.065

Dagnev, Iv. (2021a). Attitudes of Medical Bachelors in COVID-induced Online Learning of English for Academic Purposes. Knowledge International Journal, 46(6), стр. 987–991. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/133, Будва 2021, ISSN: 2545-4439 (Online)

Dagnev, Iv. (2021b). English for Healthcare Professionals: A Coursebook for the Medical Colleges. Publishing House: Medical University, Plovdiv, 188 pp, ISBN: 9786192370862.

Dagnev, Iv. (2022). English for Academic Purposes in Foreign Language teaching of Economic Majors: Problems and Perspectives. New Knowledge, Volume XI, No. 3, July – September 2022, ISSN 2367-4598 (Online), pp.73-84.

Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (2009). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multidisciplinary approach. Cambridge: CUP.

Fatima, N. (2020). English Language Teaching During the Times of COVID-19- Challenges and Opportunities: A Brief Study of GFP Students in Muscat College. Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching. Issue 21, Vol. 4, ISSN: 2456-8104

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. In Bonk, C. J. & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (In press). Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. (3-21). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

Joshi, R., & Kaur, G. (2011). The Role of the Internet in a Language Classroom. Journal of Technology for ELT. Vol. I No. 4. ISSN 2231-4431

Liu, M. (2013). Blended Learning in a University EFL Writing Course: Description and Evaluation. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 4(2), 301-309. doi:10.4304/jltr.4.2.301-309

Marsh, D. (2012). Blended learning: Creating learning opportunities for language learners. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Mike, D. (1996). Internet in the schools: A literacy perspective. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40(1), 1-13.

Neumeier, P. (2005). A closer look at blended learning: Parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning. ReCALL, 17, 163–178. doi: 10.1017/S0958344005000224.

Novawan, A., Alvarez-Tosalem, S., Ismailia, T., Wicaksono, J., & Setiarini, R. (2020). Students’ Experiences of Online English Language Learning by Using YouTube. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Social Science, Humanity, and Public Health (ICOSHIP 2020). Available Online 2 January 2021. DOI https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210101.048

Rhem, J. (2012). Blended learning: Across the disciplines, across the academy. Sterling, VI: Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Welch, A., & Napoleon, L. (2015). Professional Teaching Dispositions of Online Instructors: Why they Matter.

Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 171, 584–589.

Zhang, W., & Zhu, C. (2018). Comparing learning outcomes of blended learning and traditional face-to-face learning of university students in ESL courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 17(2), 251-273

Downloads

Published

2023-03-31

How to Cite

Saykova, M. (2023). COMPARISON OF TWO MODES OF LEARNING ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES BY MEDICAL BACHELORS. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 57(2), 313–317. Retrieved from http://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/6005