APPEARANCE OF ARTIFACTS IN PET/CT USING CONTRAST AGENTS

Authors

  • Meris Jušić University of Bihać, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Keywords:

PET/CT, artifacts, contrast agents, 18F FDG

Abstract

Positron emission tomography combined with computerized tomography is one of today's best diagnostic methods to obtain information on the function of internal organs with a small amount of radioactive drug injected into the vein as well as their anatomy and morphological changes. In addition to the many advantages of this method, there are some disadvantages, which are among the artifacts that may arise due to various causes, such as those caused by the patient, equipment faults, and the use of contrast media, which can all result in false results or misreading findings. The aim of the study was to determine whether the contrast can cause artifacts on PETCT scans. Methods: The study included a total of 50 patients that performed a PET / CT diagnostic examination at the Clinic for Nuclear Medicine and Endocrinology of UKC Sarajevo during the period of April 2017. The research was conducted as a retrospective-prospective type clinical study, which is by character of descriptive methodology. The analysis was carried out using the statistical statistics package for IBM Statistical SPSS v 21.0 sociologic research and preparation and presentation of results in Microsoft Word and Excel 2013 programs.
Results: From total of the 50 surveyed subjects, there were 24 men (48%) and 26 female (52%), and the age range ranged from 19 to 72 years, with a standard deviation of SD ± 13 , 34. Of the total number of respondents (N = 50), 25 were using a contrast agent, while 25 had a diagnostic scan without the use of a contrast agent.
Conclusion: The analysis of the PET/CT images obtained at the Clinic for Nuclear Medicine and Endocrinology KCUS determined that none of the subjects had an artifact on the images as a cause of the use of the contrast medium.

References

Balenović A, Šamija M. (2011). Klinička primjena PET/CT dijagnostike u onkologiji. Zagreb: Zrinski d. d. i Poliklinika Medikol

Beyer, T., Antoch, G., Kühl, H., & Müller, S. P. (2004). Acquisition schemes for combined 18f-fdg-pet/CT imaging: An European experience. Atlas of PET/CT Imaging in Oncology, 30-45.

Faasse, T. (2013). Positron emission tomography-computed tomography data acquisition and image management. Positron Emission Tomography - Recent Developments in Instrumentation, Research and Clinical Oncological Practice.

Grilo, A., Vieira, L., Carolino, E., Oliveira, C., Pacheco, C., Castro, M., & Alonso, J. (2017). Anxiety in cancer patients during18F-FDG PET/CT low dose: A comparison of anxiety levels before and after imaging studies. Nursing Research and Practice, 2017, 1-9.

Groves, A. M., Kayani, I., Dickson, J. C., Townsend, C., Croasdale, I., Syed, R., Nagabushan, N., Hain, S. F., Ell, P. J., & Bomanji, J. B. (2005). Oral contrast medium in PET/CT: Should you or shouldn’t you? European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 32(10), 1160-1166.

Herzog, H. (2007). Methods and applications of positron-based medical imaging. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 76(2), 337-342.

Hussain, S., Mubeen, I., Ullah, N., Shah, S. S., Khan, B. A., Zahoor, M., Ullah, R., Khan, F. A., & Sultan, M. A. (2022). Modern diagnostic imaging technique applications and risk factors in the medical Field: A review. BioMed Research International, 2022, 1-9. Griffeth, L. K. (2005). Use of pet/CT scanning in cancer patients: Technical and practical considerations. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 18(4), 321-330.

Jones, T., & Townsend, D. (2017). History and future technical innovation in positron emission tomography. Journal of Medical Imaging, 4(1), 011013.

Mallum, A., Mkhize, T., Akudugu, J. M., Ngwa, W., & Vorster, M. (2022). The role of positron emission tomography and computed tomographic (PET/CT) imaging for radiation therapy planning: A literature review. Diagnostics, 13(1), 53.

Mihailovic, J., Matovina, E., & Nikoletic, K. (2015). 18F-fluorideoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging: Artifacts and pitfalls. Medical review, 68(1-2), 41-48.

Pettinato, C., Nanni, C., Farsad, M., Castellucci, P., Sarnelli, A., Civollani, S., Franchi, R., Fanti, S., Marengo, M., & Bergamini, C. (2006). Artefacts of PET/CT images. Biomedical imaging and intervention journal, 2(4), e60.

Smajlović F, Julardžija F. (2013) Radiološka aparatura. Univerzitetski udžbenik. Sarajevo: Fakultet zdravstvenih studija Univerziteta, 2013: 139

Vandenberghe, S., Moskal, P., & Karp, J. S. (2020). State of the art in total body PET. EJNMMI Physics, 7(1).

Downloads

Published

2024-03-31

How to Cite

Jušić, M. (2024). APPEARANCE OF ARTIFACTS IN PET/CT USING CONTRAST AGENTS. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 63(4), 497–501. Retrieved from http://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/6727