CONTEMPORARY UNDERSTANDINGS OF MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF WORK AND ACHIEVEMENTS OF STUDENTS
Keywords:
teacher, evaluation, practice, analysisAbstract
In accordance with the proper performance of checking, evaluation and assessment, the main factors of the teaching process, students and teachers, but also students’ parents and society in general are interested. This is not a coincidence at all, since it is known that further education and advancement and the achievement of a certain social position depend on the results of assessment and evaluation.
There is a significant relationship between the quality of student achievement and the effectiveness of adjustment in life. Because of all this, assessment and evaluation occupy a significant place in pedagogy today. In the didactics and methodologies and for their proper implementation of individual subject all social factors are interested.
With the improvement and progress of society - the school also improved, and those changes caused changes in the grading system, so that today we have different grading systems in different social environments. The problem of assessment is still being studied today, even more than ever before, because it is required by modern social trends and the needs of society, which set complex and responsible goals and tasks for the school, which again requires a solid scientific, pedagogical-didactic basis.
References
Kurejšepi, E., & Bajrami, V. (2020). ACCEPTANCE AND OPENNESS TO CHANGES AS NEEDS IN TEACHER SELF-EVALUATION. Knowledge International Journal, 43(2), 405 - 408. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/KIJ/article/view/4921
Kurejšepi, E., & Bajrami, V. (2018). THE IMPORTANCE OF RECIVING FEEDBACKIN THE PROCES OF SELF-EVALUATION. Knowledge International Journal, 23(1), 191 - 193. Retrieved from http://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/KIJ/article/view/1502
Bajrami, V. (2019). INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN MULTICULTURAL ENVIRONMENTS IN EUROPE AND THE BALKANS. JOURNAL OF AWARENESS, 4(4), 455-466. https://doi.org/10.26809/joa.4.035
Bajrami, V. (2017). INCLUSIVE EDUCATION SYSTEM IN EUROPE AND IN KOSOVO . Mesleki Bilimler Dergisi (MBD) , 6 (2) , 134-142 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/mbd/issue/40631/488035
Bajrami, V., & Globačnik, B. (January 01, 2012). Ocenjivanje i prepoznavanje na decata so posebnii potrebi vo odrazovanieto. Megunaroden Naučno-Stručen Sobir Inkluzivno Obrazovanje, 412-422.
Trunk Širca, N., & Brajc, M. (2007). Sistemi vodenja kakovosti – sinergija med notranjo in zunanjo evalvacijo. Šola za ravnatelje, Koper: UO Fakultet za menagement, XI Posvet Vodenje v izobraževanju, Portorož, 2-4.04.2007.
Tyler, W. R. (1983, 2000). A rationale for program evaluation. in Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation. Boston: Kluwer – Nijhoff Publishing
Stufflebeam, D. L., Madaus, G. F., & Scriven, M. (1983, 2000). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing
Pastuović, N. (1999). Edukologija – Integrativna znanost o sustavu cjeloživotnog obrazovanja i odgoja. Zagreb: Znamen
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and Research methods. London: Sage Publications
Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilisation-Focused Evaluation. London: Sage Publications
Pehar, L. (2007). Psihološke posljedice reforme osnovne škole. Sarajevo: JP NIO Službeni list BiH
Poljak, V. (1980). Didaktika, Školska knjiga, Zagreb
