THE IMPACT OF DIGITIZATION ON ECONOMIC GROWTH AND HOW TO MEASURE IT

Authors

  • Sinisha Zaric Faculty of Economics University of Belgrade, Serbia,
  • Aleksandar Bozhovic Securities Commission, Serbia

Keywords:

digital technologies, fintech, employment, productivity

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence and robotics has far-reaching economic and socio-political consequences, and some of them have already manifested themselves. However, the implications of further progress in these areas are not well understood. What will be the impact on human society if artificial intelligence at some point even becomes superior in all relevant cognitive, physical, and perhaps even emotional capacities? How will productivity and income increase be boosted by artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, and what will be the relationship between labor and capital? The digitization of the economy is not a new phenomenon. However, even though it has been going on for several decades, today there is a consensus that it has reached a turning point. The symbiosis between big data and robotics announces a new economy and, therefore, new business rules. Studies have shown that an increase of 1% in the use of the Internet and mobile phones has led to an increase in economic growth by 0.12 percentage points. In the period 1993–2007. year, more frequent use of robots led to an increase in annual GDP growth and labor productivity by 0.37 and 0.36 percentage points, respectively. OECD estimates suggest that an increase in the share of digital technologies in the company's business processes by 10 percentage points, led to an increase in multifactor productivity by 1.4% after one year, or an increase in multifactor productivity of 3.9% after 3 years. Digital technologies have a strong impact on many areas of the economy. As we have seen the impact of digital technologies on labor productivity exists and tends to become even more significant. A very important factor that enables the positive externalities of digitization to be manifested in the right way is the need for the existence of infrastructure and financial inclusion that would enable the benefits of digitization to be manifested in the right way. We have seen that the analysis of OECD countries clearly shows a correlation between the implementation of digital technologies and productivity growth. This is especially clear when comparing digitally intensive branches with branches that are not primarily oriented towards digital technologies. Companies that have better access to key technical, managerial, and organizational skills have benefited more from digitization than other companies. These companies have already tended to be more productive than average companies, and digitization has contributed to increasing their advantage

References

Agénor, P. R. (2017). Caught in the Middle? The economics of Middle Income Traps. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(3), 771-791.

Alimova, G. A. (2020). Increasing The Effective Use of Human Capital in the Digital Economy. The American Journal of Applied sciences, 2(11), 127-130.

Anand, S., & Verweij, G. (2017). What’s the Real Value of AI for Your Business and how can You capitalise.

Arntz, M., Gregory, T., & Zierahn, U. (2016). The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis. EW Mannheim and University of Heidelberg, Mannheim.

Berndt, E. R., & Morrison, C. J. (1995). High-tech Capital Formation and Economic Performance in US Manufacturing Industries : An exploratory analysis. Journal of econometrics, 65(1), 9-43.

Dauth, W., Findeisen, S., & Suedekum, J. (2014). The Rise of the East and the Far East: German Labor Markets and Trade Integration. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(6), 1643-1675.

Donou-Adonsou, F., & Sylwester, K. (2016). Financial Development and Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries: New Evidence from Banks and Microfinance Institutions. Review of development finance, 6(1), 82-90.

Graetz, G., & Michaels, G. (2018). Robots at Work. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(5), 753-768.

Grigorescu, A., Pelinescu, E., Ion, A. E., & Dutcas, M. F. (2021). Human Capital in Digital Economy: An Empirical Analysis of Central and Eastern European Countries from the European Union. Sustainability, 13(4), 2020.

ITU. Measuring Digital Development. Facts and Figures, 2019, ITU Publications. 2019. Dostupno na: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/FactsFigures2019.pdf (pristupljeno 10. septembra 2021.).

Nosova, S., Norkina, A., Makar, S., & Fadeicheva, G. (2021). Digital Transformation as a New Paradigm of Economic Policy. Procedia Computer Science, 190, 657-665.

Oliner, S. D., & Sichel, D. E. (2000). The Resurgence of Growth in the Late 1990s: Is Information Technology the Story?. Journal of economic perspectives, 14(4), 3-22. Oxford Economic Papers, 66(2), 465-490. American Economic Association, Washington.

Piccolo, R., Zaric, S, (2019) The Knowledge Society: Some Evidence from Italy and Serbia, Knowledge (KIJ) , Vol.34,No 5, 1183-1191.

Quatraro, F., & Vivarelli, M. (2015). Drivers of Entrepreneurship and Post-entry Performance of Newborn Firms in Developing Countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 30(2), 277- 305.

Sorbe, S., Gal, P., Nicoletti, G., & Timiliotis, C. (2019). Digital Dividend: Policies to Harness the Productivity Potential of Digital Technologies, OECD Economic Policy Paper, No 26.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-07

How to Cite

Zaric, S., & Bozhovic, A. (2021). THE IMPACT OF DIGITIZATION ON ECONOMIC GROWTH AND HOW TO MEASURE IT. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 48(1), 17–23. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/4674