INTERACTION BETWEEN DIAGNOSIS BY ICD 10 CLASSIFICATIONS AND ABNORMAL EEG
Keywords:
abnormal EEG, mental disorders, criminogenic behavioursAbstract
Psychiatric stigmatization is a factor that significantly contributes to a favorable opportunity for patient reintegration into the community. This work indicates that resocialization and recovery of these trends have played a leading role in the reintegration of the patient into a joint psychiatric team unit mental health system. The team would conduct effective integration of forensic patients into the community. The research was of non-therapeutic, non-interventional, observational, analytical type. It was done in the Psychiatric Hospital in Demir Hisar, R. N. Macedonia, according to the design case-control. The examined group of patients was bought with the number of patients hospitalized for criminogenic behavior and treated at the Psychiatric Hospitals in Demir Hisar and whoever, at the request of the court, underwent a psychiatric examination (size 100). All patients were divided into experimental group (EG) ("case") and control group ("control") (KG). The experimental group (N = 40) had patients with recurrent criminogenic behaviors from more than one criminogenic episode, and the control group (N = 60) who had only one criminogenic episode. Male were on examination more than in fenmale, where the crime is often. Both groups of patients were classified according to the mark: diagnostic entity according to ICD-10 classifications. Result Wilcoxon test test rank EEG detection for abnormalities measurement in groups case for diagnostic features indicated statistically significant EEG scan for abnormality and diagnosis Z = -3.383, p = 0.001 (p <0.05) (p <0.05). Result The Wilcoxon test rank revealed statistically significant EEG detection of abnormality and diagnosis in KG. Abnormal EEG is statistically significant in the diagnosis of F60- 69- Personality disorders and behavioral disorders affecting the individual and F60-69- Personality disorders and behavioral disorders affecting the individual, with F11-19- Mental disorders and mental disorders F60- 69- Personality Disorders and Behavioral Disorders affect individuals, with F10- Mental Disorders and Behavioral Disorders occurring with alcohol use. Patients with psychiatric disorders (patients with personality disorders, alcohol addicts and psychoactive substances), and with recurrent criminogenicity, EEG abnormality is more common. With the help of EEG method we can diagnose psychiatric diagnoses and do psychiatric expertise as well as timely detection of existing criminogenic risks.
References
Barnao M, Ward T. (2015). Sailing uncharted seas without a compass: a review of interventions in forensic mental health. Aggr Violent Behav. 22:77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2015.04.009
Baydala L, Wikman E. (2001). The efficacy of neurofeedback in the manadgement of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Paediatrics and Child Health 6(7):451-455.
Bonta J, Blais J, Wilson HA. (2014). A theoretically informed meta-analysis of the risk for general and violent recidivism for mentally disordered offenders. Aggress Violent Behav. 19:278–87. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2014.04.014
Brown CS, Lloyd K. (2008). OPRISK: a structured checklist assessing security needs for mentally disordered offenders referred to high security psychiatric hospital. Crim Behav Ment Health. 18(3):190-202.
Chabot RJ, di Michele Fprichep L. (2005). The role of qantitative electroencephalography in child and adolescent psychiatric disorders. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 14(1):21-53,v-vi.
Convit A, Czobor P, Volavka J. (1991). Lateralized abnormality in the EEG of persistently violent psychiatric inpatients. Biol Psychiatry 30:363-370(Medline).
Dyer C. (2010). Re-offending rates are lower among offenders treated in secure hospitals than among mentally ill people held in prison. BMJ. Nov 11; 341:c6447. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6447.
Data analysis and management software (DAMS) for the Vrije Universiteit ambulatory monitoring system (VU-AMS). Manual version 1.5. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit; 2019.
Frize M, Kenny D, Lennings C. The relationship between intellectual disability, indigenous status and risk of reoffending in juvenile offenders on community orders. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008 Jun; 52(Pt 6):510-9. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
Fazel S, Fimińska Z, Cocks C, Coid J. (2016). Patient outcomes following discharge from secure psychiatric hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 208:17–25. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.149997
Grann M, Danesh J, Fazel S. (2008). The association between psychiatric diagnosis and violent re- offending in adult offenders in the community. BMC Psychiatry. ; 8:92.
Howner K, Andiné P, Bertilsson G, Hultcrantz M, Lindström E, Mowafi F, et al. (2018). Mapping systematic reviews on forensic psychiatric care: a systematic review identifying knowledge gaps. Front Psychiatry. 9:452. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.004.
Luijks MA, Bevaart F, Zijlmans J, et al. (2017). A multimodal day treatment program for multi-problem young adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 18:225.
Maurer JM, Steele VR, Cope LM, et al. (2015). Dysfunctional error-related processing in incarcerated youth with elevated psychopathic traits. Dev Cogn Neurosci 57:742–68.
Maytal J. (2002). Should children with psychiatric conditions undergo EEGs?, 31-st Annual Meeting of the Child Neurology Society, december vol.3,No.10.
Miller S, Brown J, Sees C. (2004). A preliminary strudy identifying risk factors in drop out from a prison therapeutic community J Clin Forensic Med. Aug;11(4):189-97.
Poldrack RA, Monahan J, Imrey PB, et al. (2018). Predicting violent behavior: what can neuroscience add? Trends Cogn Sci 22:111–23.
Pfeiffer, C. (1998). Juvenile crime and violence in Europe. Crime and justice: a review of research, 23:255-328
Phillips HK, et al. (2005). Risk assessment in offenders with mental disorders: relative efficacy of personal demographic, criminal history, and clinical variables. J Interpers Violence Jul;20(7):833-47.
Steele VR, Maurer JM, Bernat EM, et al. (2015). Error-related processing in adult males with elevated psychopathic traits. Pers Disord 20:1878–90.
Soderstrom IR. (2007). Mental illness in offender populations. J Offender Rehabil. 45:1–17. doi: 10.1300/J076v45n01_01
Skeem JL, Winter E, Kennealy PJ, Louden JE, Tatar JR II. (2014). Offenders with mental illness have criminogenic needs, too: toward recidivism reduction. Law Hum Behav. 38:212–24. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000054
Stone Jon, Moran Gregory. (2003).The utility of EEG in psychiatry and aggression. Psychiatric Bulletin (27):171-172.
Travin, S. (2001). Sex offenders: diagnostic assessment, treatment and related issues. In: Rosner R. editor. Principles and practice of forensic psychiatry. New York: Chapman and Hall; pp. 528–534.
Van der Geest, V., Blokland, A., Bijleveld, C. (n.d). Delinquent development in a sample of high – risk youth. Shape, content, and predictors of delinquent trajectories from age 12
Volkow N.D., Tancredi L. (1987). Neural substrates of violent behaviour: a preliminary study with positron emission tomography. Br J Psychiatry 151:668-673(Abstract).
Völlm BA, Clarke M, Herrando VT, Seppänen AO, Gosek P, Heitzman J, et al. (2017). European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on forensic psychiatry: Evidence based assessment and treatment of mentally disordered offenders. Eur Psychiatry. (2018) 51:58–73. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.12.007
Walter M, Wiesbeck GA, Dittmann V, Graf M. (2011). Criminal recidivism in offenders with personality disorders and substance use disorders over 8 years of time et risk. Psychiatry Res. Apr 30;186 (2-3):443-5. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
Wong MTH, Lumsden J, Fenton GW, et al. (1994). Elektroencephalography, computed tomography and violence ratings of male patients in a maximum-security mental hospital Acta Psychiatr Scand 90:97-101(Medline).
