EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO WRITING ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF STUDENTS’ WRITING PERFORMANCE
Keywords:
writing skills, free writing, controlled writing, EFL learnersAbstract
Students’ motivation to improve writing skills has increased over the last decade in North Macedonia with the incorporation of the obligatory final state exam in English that each high school student has to take before graduation. The last part of the exam requires that students express their writing skill in two assignments, including an essay, which are followed by a two-fold grading system where each written assignment is evaluated by two different trained evaluators. Therefore, writing as a skill takes up an important part in the evaluation of students’ proficiency level of English as a Foreign Language. While learners struggle in learning how to write properly in English, teachers face problems in finding suitable ways in which writing can be taught. One of the main reasons why teachers cannot achieve satisfactory results is the fact that they have to find a way to integrate writing along with other skills when facing lack of time and lack of a composition class. Considering students’ needs to improve writing and identifying their difficulty in mastering this skill, I decided to conduct a study that would give insights into different types of writing. This study examines two approaches to writing: controlled and free writing. It was carried out with two groups of high school students aged 17-18 who participated in a two-month instruction and intensive course in writing. The participants were tested on their writing skills before and after the writing instruction. Considering that all students were attending intermediate level of English language instruction, they could all participate regardless of their proficiency level or ability to write. The method of assessment of this study was a qualitative one, in terms of performance assessment, which included qualitative activities such as portfolios. The outcomes of this case study prove the hypothesis that students respond better and improve their writing performance when the teacher uses the free writing approach rather than the controlled writing approach. Furthermore, students who have been engaged in free writing groups and have practiced the use of drafts and unrestricted composing have shown more progress than students who have learned fixed patterns. This research proved useful for students taking part in it because they were offered an opportunity to develop their writing abilities and prepare themselves for the upcoming state exam. Beneficiaries of the findings of the research are also teachers and learners of English as a Second Language who face the same problems.
References
Bitchener, J. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing; Sep2005, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p191-205, 15p
Bulut P. (2017) The effect of primary school students writing attitudes and writing self-efficacy beliefs on their summary writing achievement, Int. Electron. J. Elem. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 281– 285
Dokchandra, D. D. (2018) The effects of process writing approach on performance of an overcrowded EFL writing class at a university in Thailand, KnE Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 161–173,
Elbow, P. (1998). Writing without teachers. New York City: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Jabali, O. (2018) Students attitudes towards EFL university writing: a case study at An-Najah National University, Palestine, Heliyon, vol. 4, no. 11
Kasper, L. F. and Petrello, B. A. (1996). Responding to ESL Student Writing: The Value of a Nonjudgmental Approach. Community Review, v14 p5-12 1996
Major, W (1994). Freewriting: A Means of Teaching Critical Thinking to College Freshmen. Retrieved on 22 October, 1994 from http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/GRAMMAR/composition/major_freewriting.html accessed on August16th, 2021
Paulston, Ch.B.(1972). Teaching writing in the ESOL classroom: Techniques of controlled composition.
TESOL Quarterly, 6, 1, 33-59, Mar 72
Raimes, A. (1999). Keys for writers. A brief handbook. (2nd Ed.) Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Reid, J. M. (1993). Teaching ESL writing. United States of America:Prentice Hall Regents.
Song, M. (1998) Experimental study of the effects of controlled writing vs. Free writing and different feedback types on writing quality and writing apprehension of EFL college students. Retrieved on July 15th, 2021 from
http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/ea/ee.pdf
Song, B. & August, B. (2002). Using portfolios to assess the writing of ESL students: a powerful alternative? Journal of Second Language Writing; February, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p49, 24p
Silva, T. & Matsuda, P. K. (Eds.) ( 2001) On Second Language Writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erblaum Associates
Wahdan, N. R. and Buragohain, D. (2018) Investigating the effects of using writing process on students writing performance at foundation program- Hai’l University, Int. J. Linguist., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 14
Yeung (2019) Exploring the strength of the process writing approach as a pedagogy for fostering learner autonomy in writing among young learners, English Lang. Teach., vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 42–54
Zamel, V.(1990). Through students’ eyes: The experiences of three ESL writers.Journal of Basic Writing, v9 n2 p83-98