THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S PROPOSAL FOR CORPORATE DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ON CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL RISKS FACES LEGAL OPPOSITION

Authors

  • Hristina Oreshkova The University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria

Keywords:

climate change, climate-related risks, corporate disclosure, audited financial statements, materiality

Abstract

Humanity faces unique challenges due to climate change. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) is recognized as the highest regulatory body in the United States with the authority to develop, adopt and
promulgate legal rules relevant to the Institution’s core mission of protecting the broad-based interests of investors,
promoting market efficiency and competition, and fostering capital formation. On 21 March 2022, the Commission
(SEC) proposed comprehensive and far-reaching guidelines for disclosure requirements for public companies
regarding climate change and climate-related risks, both actual and potential. Based on many years of volunteer
work by dedicated Commissioners, the SEC’s Proposal affects both U.S. public companies and foreign private
issuers. The Proposal, which is over 500 pages long, would require if adopted, covered public companies to disclose
information about their greenhouse gas emissions and many other related issues. The purpose of this article is to
review, analyze and discuss the challenges and strong legal opposition to the SEC’s Proposal for mandatory
corporate disclosure of climate-related risk information. The Proposal has generated discussion, heated debate, and
disagreement, and opponents have raised valid arguments and considerations. Long before the Proposal was
released, the debate over the SEC’s authority (power, competence, and jurisdiction) was ignited, particularly from a
legal perspective. This, in turn, cast a cloud over the newly proposed rules on climate-related issues. Moreover, in a
letter to the SEC, professors, led by Lawrence A. Cunningham of George Washington University, expressed concern
about the release and content of the Proposal, stating, “the passions of this topic [issue] have led the SEC to
overzealous rulemaking that exceeds its authority”. The methods employed by the author include a thorough
examination of relevant literary sources, analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, descriptive approach,
observation, comparison, analogy, and others. The SEC’s Proposal to establish rules for the disclosure of climate
change risks has been the subject of extensive public comment, questioning, and deliberation. The SEC’s asserted
authority to regulate the emerging new area of climate change – a subject that some critics believe may be outside
the scope of the SEC’s mission and mandate – without additional Congressional authorization, has been the focus of
considerable interest and exploration, criticism, analysis, and scrutiny. The SEC should consider and respond to any
substantive arguments or information provided by public commenters in accordance with the general administrative
law rules and procedures. The Agency may modify the provisions of the Proposal, under adoption, in response to
comments, but it may not, without additional notice and discussion, make changes to the Proposal that are so
significant that the public would not have had a reasonable opportunity to comment on the final rules. Significant
legal challenges and litigation were expected to follow if the Proposal was adopted in its original, initial form, or any
other form without substantial revision. Any legal challenge (objection) could take years to resolve in the federal
courts. Even then, the conflict could persist and continue as long as defendants in SEC enforcement actions raise “as
applied” arguments against the new rules. The SEC has extended the comment period to 17 June 2022 in light of
“significant interest”, particularly from the communities of investors, corporate officials, and issuers. However, due
to a technical glitch, the SEC reopened the comment period in October 2022. In line with longstanding tradition and
practice, the SEC was expected to analyze the comments before releasing the final guidelines for adoption. Despite
the ongoing dynamic debate, in November 2022, the Commission published a new, updated Proposal to improve and
standardize the rules on climate-related disclosures to investors. The Proposal of November 2022, if adopted, would,
for the first time, require public companies to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions and, in some cases, to share
this information with the reporting companies’ suppliers and customers. Some public companies would be required
to disclose additional information in their SEC filings about their long-term climate change strategies and ongoing
initiatives to manage likely climate-related risks.

References

A Capital Markets Union for people and businesses-new action plan, 24 September 2020, European Commission.

A November 2020 study on CSR and its implementation in EU company law, by Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, examined the transposition of the NFRD in six Member States.

Bloomberg. (2022). “SEC Climate Rules Pushed Back Amid Bureaucratic Legal Woes”, Bloomberg Law, Securities Law, October 19, 2022.

Brown, M. (2022). “SEC Proposes Climate Change Disclosure Rules Applicable to Public Companies”, Mayer Brown Legal Update, March 24, 2022.

Clark, M. (2022). “SEC Proposed Climate-Related Disclosure Rule Update”, Marcie Clark, Global Director, DFIN, November 16, 2022.

Commissioner Hester Peirce’s Statement supra note 3.

Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC (Text with EEA relevance).

Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups.

EU Commission Work Programme 2021, Annex I (p. 3, policy objective ‘Sustainable corporate governance’).

EU Regulation (EU) 2019/2089 amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 as regards EU Climate Transition Benchmarks, EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks and sustainability-related disclosures for benchmarks.

EU Regulation (EU) 2020/852 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment.

Farrar, M C. (2022). “Climate disclosure requirements set to take effect in the UK”, FM Financial Management, by Martin Farrar, 25 January 2022.

Gensler, G. (2021). “Statement on Proposed Mandatory Climate Risk Disclosures”, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, March 21, 2022.

https://www.dfinsolutions.com/knowledge-hub/blog/sec-and-climate-related-disclosure-proposed-rules-update

https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2022/33-11042.pdf

Hurley, A. (2022). “Five Key Takeaways from SEC’s Proposal for Climate Disclosures (Correct)”, Bloomberg, Bloomberg Law Analysis, Amanda Hurley, April 8, 2022.

International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) Exposure Draft (ED) IFRS S1, General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information (IFRS S1), IFRS Foundation, London. 2022.

International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) Exposure Draft (ED) IFRS S2, Climate-related Disclosures (IFRS S2), IFRS Foundation, London. 2022.

Mathieu de Lajartre (2022). “ISSB exposure drafts: ‘Sustainability will be core to a CPA’s role in the future’”, CPA Chartered Professional Accountants Canada, October 13, 2022.

Meyers. E. (2022). “Legal debate over SEC’s Authority Clouds Climate Rule Proposal Laying the Groundwork for Expected Legal Challenge”, Roll Call, Roll Call Policy, May 5, 2022.

Official Journal of the European Union C 209/1, 20.6.2019. European Commission 2019 Guidelines on non-financial reporting: Supplement on reporting climate-related information. Communication from the Commission Guidelines on non-financial reporting: Supplement on reporting climate-related information (2019/C 209/01).

Official Journal of the European Union C 215/1, 5.7.2017. European Commission 2017 Guidelines on non-financial reporting. Communication from the Commission Guidelines on non-financial reporting (methodology for reporting non-financial information) (2017/C 215/01).

Opinion on mandatory due diligence, September 2020, European Economic and Social Committee.

Peirce, H. M. (2022). “Statement by Commissioner Hester M. Peirce, We Are Not the Securities and Environment Commission – At Least Not Yet”, March 21, 2022, available at https://www.sec.gov/news/statement/peirce-climate-disclosure-20220321.

Resolution of 17 December 2020 on sustainable corporate governance, European Parliament.

Resolution of 29 May 2018 on sustainable finance, European Parliament.

Review No 07/2019: Reporting on sustainability – A stock take of EU Institutions and Agencies (Rapid case review).

Roston, E., & Kishan, S. (2022). “Five Key Takeaways from SEC’s Proposal for Climate Disclosures”, Eric Roston and Saijel Kishan, BNN Bloomberg, BNN Bloomberg News, March 21, 2022.

Sixteen State Attorneys General Letter to SEC Chair Gary Gensler (“State Attorneys General Letter”), June 14, 2021, available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/climate-disclosure/cll12-8915606-244835.pdf.

State Attorneys General Letter, supra note 5.

US Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77a, et seq.; Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78a, et seq.

US Senators’ Letter to Chair Gary Gensler and Commissioner Allison Herren Lee, June 13, 2021, available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/climate-disclosure/cll12-8911330-244285.pdf.

White, N. M. (2022). “SEC Drops Hints about ESG Rule in Retorts to Vague Disclosures”, Bloomberg, Bloomberg Law, March 18, 2022, available at https://news.bloomberglaw.com/securities-law/sec-scrutiny-of-big-companies-sheds-light-on-climate-priorities

Downloads

Published

2023-02-15

How to Cite

Oreshkova, H. (2023). THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S PROPOSAL FOR CORPORATE DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ON CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL RISKS FACES LEGAL OPPOSITION. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 56(1), 63–68. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/5890