LEGAL AND HISTORICAL ASPECTS OF THE DISABILITY IN NAZI GERMANY

Authors

  • Petar Kichashki Faculty of Law and History at SWU “Neofit Rilski”, Bulgaria

Keywords:

disabled people, Nazi Germany, constitution, legal analysis

Abstract

The legal and historian perspective on the Nazi Germany deeds regarding the disabled people are of vital
importance. Understanding how and in what circumstances did the Nazis industrialized death through various legal
and quasi-legal proceedings can lead to more in-depth and thorough knowledge about one of the darkest hours of
humanity. The disabled community served as a training wheel for the Nazi machinery which systematically and
from day one of its rule aimed at deconstructing the “defect” part of the society. Through this smooth political and
legal escalation of the de-humanization of a major societal group such as the disabled, the Nazis achieved the needed
understanding and know-how on how to proceed with a large-scale genocidal practice which ultimately lead to the
horrific scenes of the Holocaust. From legal standpoint the Nazi regime made all the needed judicial steps to ensure
that their anti-humane policies are firmly within the boundaries of the law. Nevertheless, this so-called “law” was no
more than mere quasi-legal texts that had no real foundation in the grand understanding of what lawful and just
systems of rule mean. This, however, did not stop the Nazis of exploiting their vulgarization of the law to justify the
smooth and steady escalation of destroying various parts of humanity that were deemed unfavorably by the regime.
This was founded in the trust of science argument and what “science” meant in that context was the fully-scaled
governmental weaponization of the pseudoscience “eugenics”. Stepping on the “good practices” from the US and
Great Britain, the Nazis implemented a government-backed policies in line with the callings of the eugenics. These
two aspects – the eugenics as a (pseudo)scientific foundation together with the needed practice and developing of
know-how on mass scale genocide – lead to the involuntary sterilization of hundreds of thousands of disabled
people, as well as the so-called “euthanasia” of thousands upon thousands of people from the same group. The
eugenics and the newly founded capacity of genocidal practices led, in part, to the horrors of the Holocaust. This
leads to the conclusion that understanding how the Nazis legally abused their power to de-humanize and eventually
destroy the most vulnerable part of the society – the disabled people – is needed in order to organize the overall
understanding of how the Nazi regime operated. The practices of the Nazi Germany are formally legal – being
organized through seemingly legal texts – but are in no way, form, or shape in alignment with the understanding of a
constitutional state. The government should ensure that the personal rights are unalienable and the state is not allpowerful
and without check. Without these guarantees the pseudo-legality of the system is just that – pseudo.

Author Biography

Petar Kichashki, Faculty of Law and History at SWU “Neofit Rilski”, Bulgaria

Department of Public Legal Sciences

References

Близнашки, Г. (2018). Конституцията. Същност, функции и върховенство. Университетско издателство “Св. Климент Охридски“, 85-88.

Близнашки, Г. (2019). Общо учение за конституцията. Университетско издателство “Св. Климент Охридски“, 627-641

Друмева, Е. (2018). Конституционно право. Пето допълнено и преработено издание, Сиела, 107-111.

Кичашки, П. (2020). Правно-исторически проявления на евгениката в САЩ, Право, политика, администрация, том 7, брой 3-4.

Кръстева, З. (2015). Правни аспекти на държавната антиеврейска политика в Царство България (1940-1944 г.). Антиеврейското законодателство в Европа и България. Правни изследвания. София, ИМП и Център за еврейски изследвания при ФФ на СУ "Св. Климент Охридски", 84.

Цеков, Б. (2015). Антиеврейското законодателство: правно-исторически и сравнително правен преглед. Право ли е Нюрнбергското расово законодателство? - в: Антиеврейското законодателство в Европа и България. Правни изследвания. София, ИМП и Център за еврейски изследвания при ФФ на СУ "Св. Климент Охридски", 113-128.

Шайрър, У. (2017). Възход и падение на Третия райх, Том 1, София, Изток-Запад, 233-283.

Broberg, G., Tyden, M. (2005), Eugenics in Sweden: Efficient Care, In: Eugenics and the Welfare State. Sterilization Policy in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland, Michigan State University Press, 98-110.

Bucur, M. (2002). Eugenics and Modernization in Interwar Romania, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.

Cleminson, R. (2014). Catholicism, Race and Empire. Eugenics in Portugal, 1900-1950, Central European University Press, Budapest, New York.

Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1935, 1:1246.

Felder, B. M. (2013). Weindling, P. J. – editors, Baltic Eugenics. Bio-politics, Race and Nation in Interwar Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, 1918-1940, Rodopi B.V., Amsterdam, New York.

Friedlander, H. (1995). The Origins of Nazi Genocide. From Euthanasia to the Final Solution, The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, London, 39-85, 110.

Gardbaum, S. (2018). What is Judicial Supremacy? Comparative Constitutional Theory, Edward Elgar Publishing, 21-45

Goldberg, D. L. (1995). Developments in German Abortion Law: A U.S. Perspective, UCLA Women’s Law Journal, 534.

Hansen, B.S. (2005). Something Rotten in the State of Denmark: Eugenics and the Ascent of the Welfare State, In: Eugenics and the Welfare State. Sterilization Policy in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland, MichiganState University Press, 9-76.

Hietala, M. (2005). From Race Hygiene to Sterilization: The Eugenics Movement in Finland, In: Eugenics and the Welfare State. Sterilization Policy in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland, Michigan State University, 232-235.

McLaren, A. (2014). Our Own Master Race. Eugenics in Canada, 1885-1945, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Buffalo, London, 7-13.

Robertson, J. (2002). Blood Talks: Eugenic Modernity and the Creation of New Japanese, History and Anthropology, 13:3, 191-216.

Roll-Hansen, N. (2005). Norwegian Eugenics: Sterilization as Social Reform, In: Eugenics and the Welfare State. Sterilization Policy in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland, Michigan State University, 176-179.

Schneider, F., & Lutz, P. (2014). Registered, Persecuted, Annihilated. The Sick and the Disabled Under National Socialism, Berlin, Springer, 48.

Schneider, W. H. (1990). The Eugenics Movement in France, 1890-1940, In: The Wellborn Science. Eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia, Edited by Adams, M. B., Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, 69-110.

Trubeta, S. (2013). Psysical Anthropology, Race and Eugenics in Greece (1880s-1970s), Brill, Leiden, Boston.

Turda, M. (2014). Eugenics and Nation in Early 20th Century Hungary, Palgrave MacMillan.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-15

How to Cite

Kichashki, P. (2023). LEGAL AND HISTORICAL ASPECTS OF THE DISABILITY IN NAZI GERMANY. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 56(1), 135–140. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/5900