DYNAMIC OF LEFT VENTRICULAR SYSTOLIC FUNCTION DURING MEDIUM-TERM FOLLOW-UP PERIOD OF PATIENTS WITH MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Authors

  • Aleksandar Serafimov Clinical Hospital – Shtip, Republic of N. Macedonia
  • Elena Joveva Clinical Hospital – Shtip, Republic of N. Macedonia
  • Marijan Jovev Clinical Hospital – Shtip, Republic of N. Macedonia

Keywords:

acute myocardial infarction, echocardiography, cardiac biomarkers, prognosis

Abstract

Acute coronary syndrome is the most common cause for admission in coronary care unit with the highest risk of death and adverse events and it is responsible for about 70% of all hospital admissions. Patients with acute coronary syndrome are diverse group in which the seriousness of underlying coronary artery disease, its prognosis and response to treatment are significantly different. Myocardial infarction remains one of the most important causes for morbidity and mortality in the world. Aim of the study is to prove association between echocardiography parameters in development of major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute myocardial infarction, treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Material and methods: This study was designed as longitudinal, prospective observational cohort study in which were included 150 patients, hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome in University Clinic of Cardiology in the time period of September 2018 till March 2019. Inclusion criteria: patients, hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome in forementioned period, who were willing to participate in the study and have given signed informed consent. Exclusion criteria: patients who were not consented to participate in the study, patients who suffered in-hospital mortality over the index hospitalization, and patients with previously known heart failure and/or AMI were excluded from the study. Results: In order to analyze the dynamics of left ventricular systolic function expressed through ejection fraction we did analysis of the global left ventricular systolic function at the time of indexed event and I the period of 3 – 6 months, with condition that there is no new major adverse cardiac event, who would influence it. Patients were classified into three groups, according to the guidelines of European Society for Cardiology for treatment of heart failure from 2012, 2016 and 2021: patients with ejection fraction <40% (HFrEF); patients with ejection fraction of 40 – 50% (HFmrEF) and patients with ejection fraction >50% (HFpEF). In multivariant analysis (logistics regression conditional) in the final model with Chi square 62,916 (p=0,000012 and 79.5% accurate prediction) three independent variables were singled out: in hospital morbidity, natriuretic peptide and initial ejection fraction (%). Conclusion: Independent predictors of improved left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with acute myocardial infarction after successful percutaneous coronary intervention are in hospital morbidity, natriuretic peptide and initial ejection fraction (%).

References

Chowdhury, N., Khan, M.A., & Hoque, M.M. (2014). Prognostic significance of B type natriuretic peptide in acute coronary syndrome. Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J.;13:78-88. https://doi.org/10.3329/cmoshmcj.v13i2.210792.

Kontos, M.C., Lanfear, D.E., Gosch, K., Daugherty, S.L., Heidenriech, P., & Spertus, J.A. (2017). Prognostic value of serial N-Terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide testing in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 120(2):181-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.004 PMid:285998023.

Goff, D.C. Jr., Lloyd-Jones, D.M., Bennett, G., Coady, S., D’Agostino, R.B., & Gibbons, R. (2014). 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(25):S49-73. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000437741.48606.98

Arnett, D.K., Blumenthal, R.S., Albert, M.A., Buroker, A.B., Goldberger, Z.D., & Hahn, E.J. (2019). 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Executive summary: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140(11):e563-595. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.00000000 00000677 PMid:308793395.

Siemelink, M.A., & Zeller, T. (2014). Biomarkers of coronary artery disease: The promise of the transcriptome. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014;16(8):513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-014-0513-4 PMid:24950674

Serafimov, A., Donevski, D., Ilova, MK., Joveva, E., Serafimova, KT., Kedev, S., & Vavlukis, M. (2022). Incremental Value of Cardiac Biomarkers in Mid-term Prognosis of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Open-Access Maced J Med Sci. 2022 Feb 14; 10(B):294-302. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.7978

Esmaeilzadeh, M., Parsaee, M., & Maleki, M. (2013). The role of echocardiography in coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction. J Tehran Heart Cent. 2013 Jan;8(1):1-13. Epub 2013 Jan 8. PMID: 23646042; PMCID: PMC3587668

Møller, J.E., Hillis, G.S., Oh, J.K., Reeder, G.S., Gersh, B.J., & Pellikka, P.A. (2006). Wall motion score index and ejection fraction for risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2006 Feb;151(2):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.03.042 PMID: 16442909.

White, H.D., Norris, R.M., Brown, M.A., Brandt, P.W., Whitlock, R.M., & Wild, C.J. (1987). Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1987 Jul;76(1):44-51. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.76.1.44. PMID: 3594774.

Chowdhury, M.T., Hoque, H., Mahmood, M., Khaled, F.I., Iqbal, K.M., Mostafa, Z., Shakil, S.S., & Zaman, S.M. (2020). Improvement of Left Ventricular Systolic Function after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Diabetic Patients with Non-ST elevated Myocardial Infarction. Mymensingh Med J. 2020 Apr;29(2):384-391. PMID: 32506094.

Mladenović, Z., Angelkov-Ristić, A., Kalimanovska-Oitrić, D., Mijailović, Z., Gligi'c, B., Obradović, S., Tavcovski, D., & Jovelić, A. (2008). Early predictors of left ventricular function improvement late after myocardial infarction. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2008 Jan;65(1):9-14. doi: 10.2298/vsp0801009m. PMID: 18368932.

Serrao, G.W., Lansky, A.J., Mehran, R., & Stone, G.W. (2018). Predictors of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Improvement After Primary Stenting in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 15;121(6):678-683. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 22. PMID: 29394998.

Ohashi, J., Sakakura, K., Yamamoto, K., Taniguchi, Y., Tsukui, T., Seguchi, M., Nanba-Sato, H., Shibata, K., Sasaki, W., Ikeda, T., Wada, H., Momomura, SI., & Fujita, H. (2019). Determinants of Improvement of Mid-term Ejection Fraction in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. Int Heart J. 2019 Nov 30;60(6):1245-1252. doi: 10.1536/ihj.19-126. Epub 2019 Nov 15. PMID: 31735776.

Karakus, A., & Uğuz, B. (2021). An early echocardiographic prediction for functional myocardial recovery after ST elevation myocardial infarction. Kardiologiia. 2021 Feb 10;61(1):66-71. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2021.1.n1477. PMID: 33706689.

Wang, S., Cheng, S., Zhang, Y., Lyu, Y., & Liu, J. (2022). Extent of Ejection Fraction Improvement After Revascularization Associated with Outcomes Among Patients with Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Int J Gen Med. 2022;15: 7219 – 7228 https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S380276

Downloads

Published

2023-06-01

How to Cite

Serafimov, A., Joveva, E., & Jovev, M. (2023). DYNAMIC OF LEFT VENTRICULAR SYSTOLIC FUNCTION DURING MEDIUM-TERM FOLLOW-UP PERIOD OF PATIENTS WITH MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 58(4), 527–537. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/6139