DIRECT AND INDIRECT CARBON EMISSIONS IN A PRODUCTION FACILITY

Authors

  • Teodora Topcheva Goce Delcev University, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Stip, North Macedonia

Keywords:

GHG protocol, carbon emissions, mitigation measures

Abstract

Since the last century many of the governmental and nongovernmental organizations have recognized the need of reducing the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and were taking measures to mitigate the effects on the global warming. The manufacturing industry leaders have started to act on GHG reduction and set up specific targets and mitigation measures to contribute to limiting the global warming as much as possible. Identifying the corporate carbon footprint by emission scope classified in: Scope 1, 2 and Scope 3 is very challenging and really demanding process but at the same time is the key step to reduce the carbon emissions. The Greenhouse gas protocol (GHG protocol) is a global standard framework for emission management in operations and supply chain. The purpose of this paper is to identify and calculate the carbon footprint in a production facility according the GHG protocol. The paper covers direct emissions generated by sources owned or controlled by the facility, and indirect emissions generated by purchased electricity monitored during a period of one year. The data are analyzed and after mitigation measures to reduce carbon footprint are proposed. The results present that emissions generated by purchased electricity have the largest contribution to the overall company direct and indirect emissions. Based on the results the recommendations for improvement are focused on reducing electricity consumption and use of renewable energy sources. This approach and the proposed actions can be implemented in manufacturing facilities operating in various types of industries.

References

Alvarez, S., Blanquer, M., & Rubio, A. (2014). Carbon footprint using the compound method based on financial accounts. The case of the School of Forestry Engineering, Technical University of Madrid. J. 224–232.

Bjørn A., Kalbar P., Nygaard S.E., Kabins S., Jensen C.L., Birkved M., Schmidt J., & Hauschild M.Z. (2018). Pursuing necessary reductions in embedded GHG emissions of developed nations: will efficiency improvements and changes in consumption get us there? Global Environ. Change, 52, pp. 314-324.

Grindsted, T. (2011). Sustainable Universities—From Declarations on Sustainability in Higher Education to National Law. Environ. Econ. 2, 27–34.

Hirano Y., Ihara T., & Hara M. (2020). Estimation of Direct and Indirect Household CO2 Emissions in 49 Japanese Cities with Consideration of Regional Conditions, Sustainability 2020, 12 (11),4678.

National Institute for Environmental Studies. 2050 Low-Carbon Society Scenario. Available online: http://2050.nies.go.jp/LCS/eng/japan.html (2020) .

Pörtner H.O., Roberts D.C., Adams H., Adler C., Aldunce P., Ali E., Begum R.A., Betts R., Kerr R.B., Biesbroek R., et al. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability IPCC.

Rogelj J., Shindell D., Jiang K., Fifita S., Forster P., Ginzburg V., Handa C., Kheshgi H., Kobayashi S., Kriegler E., et al.(2018). Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5 C in the context of sustainable development Global Warming of 1.5 C, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, pp. 93-174.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007). AR4 Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Retrieved from www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/syr/

Townsend, J., & Barrett, J. (2015). Exploring the applications of carbon foot printing towards sustainability at a UK university: Reporting and decision making. J. Clean. 107, 164–176.

Yanez, P.P., Sinha, A., & Vásquez, M. (2019). Carbon Footprint Estimation in a University Campus: Evaluation and Insights. Sustainability 12, 181

Weidema, B.P., Thrane, M., Christensen, P., Schmidt, J., & Løkke, S. (2008). Carbon footprint—A catalyst for life cycle assessment? J. Ind. Ecol. 12, 3–6

Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J. (2008). A definition of ‘carbon footprint’. In Ecological Economics Research Trends; Pertsova, C.C., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) & World Resources Institute (WRI). The Greenhouse Protocol—A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. Retrieved from: www.ghgprotocol.org

Downloads

Published

2023-09-30

How to Cite

Topcheva, T. (2023). DIRECT AND INDIRECT CARBON EMISSIONS IN A PRODUCTION FACILITY. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 60(3), 427–430. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/6283