CLINICAL METHOD FOR ORTHODONTIC DIGITAL CONSTRUCTION BITE
Keywords:
Orthodontic Digital models, Digital construction bite, Orthodontic functional appliance construction bite, 3D Scanning technicAbstract
Nowadays removable functional appliances are highly widespread in the field of Orthodontic.
The construction bite taking may be challenge trough intraoral scanner. The problem comes from the fact the patient must stay in the exactly same lay, while the operator make right and left digital occlusion. For the patient is easy to make “the same” bite, and the operator make both sides without difficulties. For fabrication of functional appliances the construction bite require to have space between tooth arches, and upper and lower arch to be in determined relations. There is patients, which can stay steel, during the operator make the both sides, but there is always risk to make a little motion, which will compromise the construction bite and fabrication of appliance. Thereby, the operator need “something” which will provide the tooth arches to stay stable during operator take the construct occlusion.
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical method for Orthodontic digital construction bite taking.
Methodology: Intraoral scanner Medit i 700 was used for presentation of this clinical method. Condensation silicone Zetaplus by Zhermark was used for the bite guide. The patient included in the article was after orthodontic treatment with fixed technique. In the same day the brackets was taken off, the construction bite was taken in clinical setting.
Results: The present clinical method was effective to provide stability during construction occlusion for fabrication of Twin Bloc appliance has been taking. The method may be used for any construction bite that is needed – for other functional appliances, for surgical guide and etcetera.
Conclusions: The digital intraoral scanner are reliable tool for provide accurate 3D model of the teeth, and to take normal and construction occlusion. The described methodology is a little step in digital workflow process, which provide stability of occlusion and chance for clinician to be sure in construction bite. The advantages that it give are improved patient experience, increased treatment efficiency, time efficiency. This methodology is a little step in digital workflow process, which provide stability of occlusion and chance for clinician to be sure in construction bite. The advantages that it gives are improved patient experience, increased treatment efficiency, time efficiency.
The new technology continue to evolve and suite better clinicians needs which affect as improvement of patients care.
References
Charkhandeh, S., Kuhns, D., & Kim, S. (2017). A Fully Digital Workflow and Device Manufacturing for Mandibular Repositioning Devices for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Feasibility Study. Journal of Dental Sleep Medicine, 04(04), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.15331/jdsm.6742
Chiu, A., Chen, Y. W., Hayashi, J., & Sadr, A. (2020). Accuracy of CAD/CAM digital impressions with different intraoral scanner parameters. Sensors (Switzerland), 20(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20041157
Clark, W. J. (1988). The twin block technique A functional orthopedic appliance system. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 93(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90188-6
Francisco, I., Ribeiro, M. P., Marques, F., Travassos, R., Nunes, C., Pereira, F., Caramelo, F., Paula, A. B., & Vale, F. (2022). Application of Three-Dimensional Digital Technology in Orthodontics: The State of the Art. Biomimetics, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7010023
Graf, S., Tarraf, N. E., & Vasudavan, S. (2022). Direct printed removable appliances: A new approach for the Twin-block appliance. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 162(1), 103–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.08.019
Khanagar, S. B., Al-Ehaideb, A., Vishwanathaiah, S., Maganur, P. C., Patil, S., Naik, S., Baeshen, H. A., & Sarode, S. S. (2021). Scope and performance of artificial intelligence technology in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical decision-making - A systematic review. Journal of Dental Sciences, 16(1), 482–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.05.022
Kihara, H., Hatakeyama, W., Komine, F., Takafuji, K., Takahashi, T., Yokota, J., Oriso, K., & Kondo, H. (2020). Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 64(2), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.07.010
Küffer, M., Drescher, D., & Becker, K. (2022). Application of the Digital Workflow in Orofacial Orthopedics and Orthodontics: Printed Appliances with Skeletal Anchorage. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083820
Lowe, R., Makowka, S., Manzella, K., Warunek, S., & Al-Jewair, T. (2020). Mechanical properties of the NiTi Memoria Leaf Spring Activated Expander (NiTi MLSAE) for maxillary transverse discrepancy correction: An in-vitro study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 12(2), e154–e160. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.56579
M, M. N., N.C., S. C., Srinivasan, D., Kalidass, P., D., D., Kishore, S., & S., S. (2021). Orthodontics in the Era of Digital Innovation – A Review. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 10(28), 2114–2121. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2021/432
Mangano, F., Shibli, J. A., & Fortin, T. (2016). Digital Dentistry: New Materials and Techniques. International Journal of Dentistry, 2016, 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5261247
Marradi, F., Staderini, E., Zimbalatti, M. A., Rossi, A., Grippaudo, C., & Gallenzi, P. (2020). How to obtain an orthodontic virtual patient through superimposition of three-dimensional data: A systematic review. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/APP10155354
Noro, T., Tanne, K., & Sakuda, M. (1994). Orthodontic forces exerted by activators with varying construction bite heights. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 105(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70113-X
Salloum, E., Millett, D. T., Kelly, N., McIntyre, G. T., & Cronin, M. S. (2018). Soft tissue changes: A comparison between changes caused by the construction bite and by successful treatment with a modified Twin-block appliance. European Journal of Orthodontics, 40(5), 512–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx098
Shah, A. A., & Sandler, J. (2009). How to... take a wax bite for a twin block appliance. Journal of Orthodontics, 36(1), 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1179/14653120722869
Yordanova, G., Chalyovski, M., Gurgurova, G., & Georgieva, M. (2023). Digital Design of Laser-Sintered Metal-Printed Dento-Alveolar Anchorage Supporting Orthodontic Treatment. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137353
Yordanova, G. (2023). Предизвикателства на интерсептивното лечение.2023
Петрунов, В. (2023). Дигитализирането на ортодонтията еволюция или революция. 2023.