CRIME PREVENTION MODELS IN RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS

Authors

  • Inda Kreso Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security Studies University Of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Keywords:

sector of renewable energy sources, power plant construction projects, preventive risk recognition models, crime prevention

Abstract

Organised crime groups, corrupt government officials, political elites, state-owned companies, and private sector companies see renewable energy power plant construction projects as business opportunities for making illegal profits and money laundering. State subsidies that support the construction of renewable energy power plants are very attractive to organised criminal groups who see an opportunity to obtain money from state budgets through corrupt actions. Through a series of irregularities in the process of building renewable energy power plants, which include non-transparent tender conditions, illegal obtaining of land concessions for the construction of power plants, falsification of environmental studies and feasibility studies, construction of power plants on unsuitable terrain, and bribing the government officials to speed up the obtaining of construction permits, criminal groups gain a monopoly over the sector of renewable energy sources, in which very large amounts of money from state budgets have been invested on a global level in the last ten years. The aim of this work is to identify models for preventive risk recognition as a tool for crime prevention in the sector of renewable energy sources through a systematic review of the available literature. Models for the preventive identification of the risk of criminal activities represent a formalised set of steps or protocols that can be used at any stage of renewable energy projects, especially in projects of the construction of renewable energy power plants, in order to mitigate and minimise the risk of committing criminal acts. Preventive risk recognition models ensure that a power plant construction project runs smoothly from start to finish without unnecessary financial losses thanks to their ability to point out all the weak points of the complete process. By early detection of vulnerabilities during the construction of renewable energy power plants, we can completely prevent the commission of crime. The literature describes 5 basic models for timely recognition of the risk of committing criminal acts, and they are: corruption risk mapping, availability of data in public registers, initiatives for improving transparency, improvement of enforcement of anti-corruption laws and penalties for corruption, and joint ownership models. In addition to these basic 5 models, a systematic review of the literature revealed that there is insufficient focus on the financial aspect of renewable energy construction projects. Due to the perceived importance of the financial component in preventing criminal activities, this paper also proposes a sixth model and expands the basic model with an additional model called "Financial assessment of renewable energy projects." The likelihood that criminal offences will occur at every stage of a renewable energy power plant project is a fundamental obstacle facing the renewable energy sector. Due to the presence of crime, a smooth transition to green energy is prevented completely, which again entails the impossibility of suppressing the use of fossil fuels. One of the main tasks of the described models, in addition to the timely detection of potential criminal activities, is to accelerate the transition to green energy and support sustainable development. By raising the awareness of the population and enabling greater transparency in the entire sector, as well as greater transparency of the construction process of renewable energy power plants, it restores trust in state institutions and power holders and improves the entire political image of the country. By increasing the transparency of processes where information is easily accessible to the public, we prevent mafia organisations and organised crime groups from financing similar projects in the hope that they will be able to launder money through investments in renewable sources.

References

Bercu, A. M., Paraschiv, G., & Lupu, D. (2019). Investigating the energy-economic growth-governance nexus: Evidence from Central and Eastern European countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123355

Caneppele, S., Riccardi, M., & Standridge, P. (2013). Green energy and black economy: Mafia investments in the wind power sector in Italy. Crime, Law and Social Change, 59(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9418-1

Checchi, V. V., & Polo, M. (2020). Blowing in the Wind: The Infiltration of Sicilian Mafia in the Wind Power Business. Italian Economic Journal, 6(2), 325–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-020-00126-z

Debnath, K. B., & Mourshed, M. (2018). Corruption significantly increases the capital cost of power plants in developing contexts. Frontiers in Energy Research, 6(MAR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00008

Deiana, C., & Geraci, A. (2021). Are wind turbines a mafia windfall? The unintended consequences of green incentives. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2021.103691

Delapedra-Silva, V., Ferreira, P., Cunha, J., & Kimura, H. (2022). Methods for Financial Assessment of Renewable Energy Projects: A Review. In Processes (Vol. 10, Issue 2). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10020184

Dogmus, Ö. C., & Nielsen, J. Ø. (2020). The on-paper hydropower boom: A case study of corruption in the hydropower sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Ecological Economics, 172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106630

Eitan, A., Herman, L., Fischhendler, I., & Rosen, G. (2019). Community–private sector partnerships in renewable energy. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 105, pp. 95–104). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.058

Endriana, M. S., Yusriadi, Silviana, A., & Fernando, Z. J. (2023). Green Financial Crime: Expose about Financial Crime in the Environment and Renewable Energy World. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1270(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1270/1/012012

Fortelny, M.-J. (n.d.). Corruption in the energy sector : the dangers of bcef (Bribery, Crime, Exploitation, Fraud).

Gani, A. (2021a). Sustainability of energy assets and corruption in the developing countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 741–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.023

Gani, A. (2021b). Sustainability of energy assets and corruption in the developing countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 741–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.023

Gennaioli, C., & Tavoni, M. (2016). Clean or dirty energy: evidence of corruption in the renewable energy sector. Public Choice, 166(3–4), 261–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0322-y

Goedkoop, F., & Devine-Wright, P. (2016). Partnership or placation? the role of trust and justice in the shared ownership of renewable energy projects. Energy Research and Social Science, 17, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.021

Handayani, B. D., Yanto, H., Pujiati, A., Ridzuan, A. R., Keshminder, J. S., & Shaari, M. S. (2022). The Implication of Energy Consumption, Corruption, and Foreign Investment for Sustainability of Income Distribution in Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315915

Hitzeroth, M., & Megerle, A. (2013). Renewable energy projects: Acceptance risks and their management. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 27, pp. 576–584). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.022

Holum, M. L. (2016). Governance of a public sector joint venture: the control challenges of dominated owners. Local Government Studies, 42(6), 1004–1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2016.1207631

Jiang, W., & Martek, I. (2021). Political risk analysis of foreign direct investment into the energy sector of developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127023

Junxia, L. (2019). Investments in the energy sector of Central Asia: Corruption risk and policy implications. Energy Policy, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110912

Kaiser, G. (n.d.). CORRUPTION IN THE ENERGY SECTOR: CRIMINAL FINES, CIVIL JUDGMENTS, AND LOST ARBITRATIONS. http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/09/18/uk-eu-transparency-idUKBRE88H12020120918.

Krishnamurti, C., Shams, S., & Velayutham, E. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and corruption risk: A global perspective. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 14(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2018.02.002

Kunze, C., & Becker, S. (2015). Collective ownership in renewable energy and opportunities for sustainable degrowth. Sustainability Science, 10(3), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0301-0

Lam, P. T. I., & Law, A. O. K. (2018). Financing for renewable energy projects: A decision guide by developmental stages with case studies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90, 937–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.083

Lamé, G. (2019). Systematic Literature Reviews: An Introduction. 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.169ï

Linnerud, K., Toney, P., Simonsen, M., & Holden, E. (2019). Does change in ownership affect community attitudes toward renewable energy projects? Evidence of a status quo bias. Energy Policy, 131, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.039

López, L., & Fontaine, G. (2019). How transparency improves public accountability: The extractive industries transparency initiative in Mexico. Extractive Industries and Society, 6(4), 1156–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2019.09.008

Lu, J., Ren, L., Qiao, J., Yao, S., Strielkowski, W., & Streimikis, J. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and corruption: Implications for the sustainable energy sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154128

Piterou, A., & Coles, A. M. (2021). A review of business models for decentralised renewable energy projects. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(3), 1468–1480. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2709

Ren, S., Hao, Y., & Wu, H. (2021). Government corruption, market segmentation and renewable energy technology innovation: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113686

Riccardi, M. (2014). When criminals invest in businesses: Are we looking in the right direction? An exploratory analysis of companies controlled by mafias. In Organized Crime, Corruption and Crime Prevention: Essays in Honor of Ernesto U. Savona (Vol. 9783319018393, pp. 197–206). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01839-3_23

Rimšaitė, L. (2019). Corruption risk mitigation in energy sector: Issues and challenges. Energy Policy, 125, 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.066

Shakeyev, S., Baineyeva, P., Kosherbayeva, A., Yessenova, G., & Zhanseitov, A. (2023). Enhancing the Green Energy Revolution: Analyzing the Impact of Financial and Investment Processes on Renewable Energy Projects in Kazakhstan. ECONOMICS - Innovative and Economics Research Journal, 11(1), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2023-0057

Sovacool, B. K. (2021). Clean, low-carbon but corrupt? Examining corruption risks and solutions for the renewable energy sector in Mexico, Malaysia, Kenya and South Africa. In Energy Strategy Reviews (Vol. 38). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100723

Downloads

Published

2024-10-07

How to Cite

Kreso, I. (2024). CRIME PREVENTION MODELS IN RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 66(1), 93–98. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/6994