STUDENT'S PERCEPTIONS OF CHATGPT USE IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Authors

  • Fauzi Skenderi University of Tetovo, Tetovo, North Macedonia
  • Lindita Skenderi University of Tetovo, Tetovo, North Macedonia

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, chatGPT, students, AI tools

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has spread very rapidly and has taken a strong position in education too. All parts of education have been touched by different forms of AI making it inevitable for both teachers and learners. Especially when it comes to higher education, students are young adults who own smartphones and other devices, connected to internet almost 24/7. This has surely served them well in other ways, but has also made them lazier in finding ways to seek knowledge and achieve their final mission. Of course, conditions are not the same for students in all countries, depending on the development of the country in different aspects.
The 79 participants in the survey are students from different study programs at the University of Tetova. The aim of the study is to see if students are informed about Chat GPT use in general and if they personally use it for their studies and educational purposes. Except students’ perceptions on the tool’s benefits, the study tries to see what are their standings and opinions on the future development and consequences.
The results were somehow conflicting, and their use is not always interconnected with their perceptions of future development of these tools. It also showed that the majority of them were uncertain about the negative consequences in their studies in general, because they felt like it made them lazier by offering answers and solutions in few seconds.

References

Azaria, A. (2022). ChatGPT usage and limitations.

Baidoo-Anu, D.; Owusu Ansah, L.(2023) Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. SSRN 2023, 4337484.

Biswas, S. (2023). ChatGPT and the future of medical writing. Radiology 307, 223312. doi: 10.1148/radiol.223312

ChatGPT Passes Exams from Law and Business Schools. Available online: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/01/26/tech/chatgpt-

Choi, J.H.; Hickman, K.E.; Monahan, A.; Schwarcz, D. Chatgpt Goes to Law School. SSRN 2023, 4335905.

Elkhodr, M., Gide, E., Wu, R., & Darwish, O. (2023). ICT students’ perceptions towards ChatGPT: An experimental reflective lab analysis. STEM Education, 3(2), 70-88.

Firat, M. (2023). What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 57-63.

Fuchs, K. (2023, May). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: is Chat GPT a blessing or a curse?. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1166682). Frontiers Media SA.

Gilson, A., Safranek, C. W., Huang, T., Socrates, V., Chi, L., Taylor, R. A., et al. (2023). How does chatgpt perform on the united states medical licensing examination? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. JMIR Med. Educ. 9, e45312. doi: 10.2196/45312

https://ssrn.com/abstract=4335905 (accessed on 10 March 2023).

Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410.

OpenAI (2023). OpenAI Official Website. Introducing ChatGPT - Learn more. Available online at: https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/ (accessed February 10, 2023).

passes-exams (accessed on 10 March 2023).

Shoufan, A. (2023). Exploring students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: Thematic analysis and follow-up survey. IEEE Access, 11, 38805-38818.

Tajik, E. (2024). A comprehensive Examination of the potential application of Chat GPT in Higher Education Institutions.

Valova, I., Mladenova, T., & Kanev, G. (2024). Students' Perception of ChatGPT Usage in Education. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 15(1).

Wu, J. Y. (2017). The indirect relationship of media multitasking self-efficacy on learning performance within the personal learning environment: Implications from the mechanism of perceived attention problems and self-regulation strategies. Comput. Educ. 106, 56–72. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.010

Downloads

Published

2024-10-07

How to Cite

Skenderi, F., & Skenderi, L. (2024). STUDENT’S PERCEPTIONS OF CHATGPT USE IN HIGHER EDUCATION. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 66(2), 193–198. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/7016

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>