BLOOM'S MASTER LEARNING MODEL: A CASE STUDY EXAMPLE OF APPLICATION IN THE TVET

Authors

  • Iliyan Vasilev Sofia University “Kliment Ohridski”, Bulgaria

Keywords:

Mastery Learning, Vocational Education, competence

Abstract

The article examines the theoretical concept on which Bloom's Master y Learning rests, as well as certain of its characteristics that are still relevant and appropriate today. Research on the relationship between Mastery Learning and achievement for students as well as the impact on positive levels of motivation and attitudes towards learning is reviewed and summarized. With its consilient characteristic including competency-based curriculum design, preliminary assessment, flexible learning paths and educational divergence, as well as self-study formative assessment and assessment of mastery, the proposed model could fit in vocational education and training courses. A generalized example of the application of elements of Mastery Learning in electrical engineering classes is proposed: some guidelines for the stages of Mastery Learn ing are indicated, and examples of Mastery Learning modules are given. In the article is disclosed in detail a case example of applications such a model with all the predicaments and ensuing endeavoring challenges in the field of electrical science. It is revealed the expected positive results and the appropriateness of the developing of such model. Clearly the Master learning is not a nostrum or elusive remedy for the variety of problems in the vocational education but it could contribute to some benefits like building confidence, improving technical skills, development early identification of needs, “Stronger Foundations”, personal excogitation and ratiocination. Mastery learning as a model can contribute to the effectiveness of learning in VET with its flexible design of a curriculum based on competencies where each is divided into smaller, measurable learning objectives; with a mastery assessment that requires students to demonstrate mastery of each competency before moving on to the next level involving hands-on assessments, simulations, or real-world projects where they demonstrate their skills; with self-paced learning offering online modules, instructional videos and hands-on exercises that allow students to learn at their own pace. The core structure of Master learning applied in VET is based on the backward design with the three stages: identifying desired results, determination of acceptable evidence and planning learning experiences and instructions with creating cyclical patterns of learning instead of linear patterns. Each cycle starts with clear objectives, planning a mastery rubric, planning the assessment and finishes lastly with lesson planning. This could be achieved with an established space effective learning where students solve problems in collaboration groups discussing and debating issues from real life doing practical hands-on activities searching and resuming piles of information on a particular from different sources and the internet.

References

Adeyemo, S.A., & Babajide, V.F. (2014). Effects of mastery learning approach on students' achievement in physics. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 5( 2 ), 910-920.

Amurao, M. K., & Ilagan, J. B. (2021). Designing a multiple submission policy supporting mastery learning for a design thinking class in a purely online learning environment. ISSN: 2186-5892 The Asian Conference on Education 2021: Official Conference Proceedings, 273–284. https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2186-5892.2022.21

Anderson, L., & Burns, R. (1987). Values, evidence, and mastery learning. Review of Educational Research, 57( 2 ), 215–223.

Arlin, M. (1982). Teacher responses to student time differences in mastery learning. American Journal of Education, 90(4), 334-352.

Arlin, M., & Webster, J. (1983). Time costs of mastery learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 187–195.

Berger, M., Weber, L., McNamara, S., Shin-Kim, J., Strauss, J., & Pathak, S. (2022). Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Course for Tube Thoracostomy. MedEdPORTAL. 18:11266. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11266

Bloom, B.S. (1968). Chicago Univ., ID of E., & Regional Educational Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, DN Learning for Mastery. Instruction and Curriculum. Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1., 1(2).

Bloom, B.S. (1971). Individual differences in school achievement: A vanishing point? Education at Chicago, 4(14)

Bloom, B. (1987). A response to Slavin's mastery learning reconsidered. Review of Educational Research, 57(4), 507-508.

Chang, C. C., & Chen, Y. (2020). Using mastery learning theory to develop task-centered hands-on STEM learning of Arduino-based educational robotics: psychomotor performance and perception by a convergent parallel mixed method. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(9), 1677–1692. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1741400

Dweck, C.S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048.

Emery, A., Sanders, M., Anderman, L.H., & Yu, S.L. (2018). When mastery goals meet mastery learning: administrator, teacher, and student perceptions. Journal of Experimental Education, 86 (3), 419-441.

Guskey, T.R. (2001). Benjamin S. Bloom's Contributions to Curriculum, Instruction, and School Learning.

Guskey, T. (2007). Closing achievement gaps: revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom's “learning for mastery.” Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(1), 8–31.

Guskey, T. R. (2022). Implementing mastery learning. Corwin Press.

Guskey, T.R., & Anderman, E.M. (2013). In search of a useful definition of mastery. Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology Faculty Publications. Vol. 10.

Guskey, T. (2010). Lessons of mastery learning. Educational Leadership., 68(2).

Hou, X., Nagashima, T., & Aleven, V. (2022). Design a Dashboard for Secondary School Learners to Support Mastery Learning in a Gamified Learning Environment. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 542-549). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Hunter, M. (1982). Mastery teaching. El Segundo, CA: TIP Publications.

Johnson, C.C. (2013). Educational turbulence: the influence of macro and micro-policy on science education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(4), 693-715.

Johnson, C.E., Erwin, H.E., Kipp, L., & Beighle, A. (2017). Student perceived motivational climate, enjoyment, and physical activity in middle school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36(4), 398-408.

Kaplan, A. & Maehr, M.L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141-184.

Kivlehan, E., Branch, D., Reger, C., & Rojas, A. M. (2023). Simulation‐based mastery learning for intrathecal baclofen pump management in physical medicine and rehabilitation: A pilot study. PM&R. DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.13101

Madjar, N., & Chohat, R. (2017). Will I succeed in middle school? A longitudinal analysis of self-efficacy in school transitions in relation to goal structures and engagement. Educational Psychology, 37(6), 680-694.

McGaghie, W.C. (2015). When I say … mastery learning. Medical Education, 49(6), 558-559.

Meece, J.L., Anderman, E.M., & Anderman, L.H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487-503.

Nolan, J. (2016). Growing mastery in NYC: in New York City, the Mastery Collaborative is working with more than 40 public schools to implement competency-based learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(3), 41.

Senko, C., Hulleman, C.S., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the

crossroads: old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 26-47.

Slavin, R. (1987). Mastery learning reconsidered. Review of Educational Research, 57(2), 175–213.

Slavin, R. (1989). On mastery learning and mastery teaching. Educational Leadership, 46(6), 77-79.

Wolters, C. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students' motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236–250.

Zare, S. (2023). The effect of mastery learning method on the academic performance and academic achievement motivation of the elementary school students. Transcendent Education, 3(2), 101-112.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-07

How to Cite

Vasilev, I. (2024). BLOOM’S MASTER LEARNING MODEL: A CASE STUDY EXAMPLE OF APPLICATION IN THE TVET. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 66(2), 211–216. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/7019