THE INVOLVEMENT OF BODY LANGUAGE TO HELP ALBANIAN STUDENTS UNDERSTAND, LEARN AND USE AMBIGUOUS WORDS CORRECTLY

Authors

  • Ermenita Çuka “Fan S. Noli” University, Korçë, Albania

Keywords:

Body language, gesture, lexical ambiguity, homonymy

Abstract

Vocabulary language acquisition in particular ambiguous vocabulary acquisition has always been an obstacle while learning a second language, which students try to surmount through different strategies and methods. This article aims to highlight the role played by the use of body language in the acquisition of vocabulary and the understanding of lexical ambiguous English words by Albanian students. As one of the first challenges that students encounter in learning a second language (L2) is vocabulary acquisition, especially polysemous words or ambiguous ones, it is very important to find ways that can help facilitate understanding and learning vocabulary in general and ambiguous words specifically. It has been proven by different scholars that body language, hand movements, joint attention, and the presence of multimodal signals, such as eye contact, affect the acquisition process of language and especially polisemous or ambiguous vocabulary (Grzyb & Vigliocco, 2020; Kreysa et al., 2018). Therefore, researchers have tried to find ways and effective methods that can help them avoid any kind of problems or obstacles regarding ambiguous vocabulary acquisition. As the acquisition of the foreign languages consists considerably on the appropriate learning of its vocabulary and the variety of meaning that each word carries, learning vocabulary without difficulty and longstanding needs various strategies. It is raised the hypothesis that the use of body language and gestures can facilitate ambiguous vocabulary acquisition and its proper use. This led us toward our research questions: Does body language and gestures affect the resolution of lexical ambiguity? Can the use of gestures and body language facilitate acquisition and the proper use of the ambiguous words? For this purpose, it is thought to imply in our research 50 Albanian students, who actually study at the secondary school and belong to the intermediate level of language acquisition. The students participating in this study were selected to belong to the same level of language acquisition and were randomly divided into two groups: an experimental group and a control group. In the experimental groups, the ambiguous vocabulary was learned by being reinforced through different body language actions, whereas in the control group the ambiguous vocabulary was taught in the traditional way. The outcomes provide fairly strong support for the gesture effect on vocabulary acquisition in general and the ambiguous one in particular. The results that came out from the study highlighted the importance of body language and gestures for facilitating the understanding of ambiguous words or ambiguous lexicon. It is concluded that the use of body language and gestures or facial expressions facilitates lexical retrieval because the position of the hands and the body not only shows more clearly the intended meaning of the ambiguous or polisemous words used by the interlocutors but also clarify their retrieval and the appropriate use. (Butcher and Goldin-Meadow 2000)

Author Biography

Ermenita Çuka, “Fan S. Noli” University, Korçë, Albania

Department of English Language

References

Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., & Young, A. J. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(6), 593–613.

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.

Blott, L. M., Hartopp, O., Nation, K., & Rodd, J. M. (2022). Learning about the meanings of ambiguous words: Evidence from a word-meaning priming paradigm with short narratives. PeerJ, 10, e14070.

Booth, A., McGregor, K., & Rohlfing, K. J. (2008). Socio-pragmatics and attention: Contributions to gesturally guided word learning in toddlers. Language Learning and Development, 4(3), 179–202.

Booton, S. A, Hodgkiss, A, Mathers,S., & Murphy V.A. (2022). Measuring knowledge of multiple word meanings in children with English as a first and additional language and relationship to reading comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 49(1), 164–196

Broaders, S. C., Kelly, S. D., Wiltermuth, S. S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007). The role of gesture in communication and thinking. Cognitive Science, 31(3), 657–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210701498823

Butcher, C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2000). Gesture and the transition from one- to two-word speech. Cognitive Development, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00016-0

Çetinçelik, M., Rowland, C. F., & Snijders, T. M. (2021). Do the eyes have it? A systematic review on the role of eye gaze in infant language development. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 589096.

Coventry, K. R., & Garrod, S. C. (2004). Saying, seeing, and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. Psychology Press.

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007). Pointing sets, the stage for learning language—and creating language. Child Development, 78(3), 741–745. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Wagner, S. (2005). How our gestures help us think In R. J. Davidson & K. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 263–286). Oxford University Press.

Göksun, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2009). How do preschoolers express cause in gesture and speech? Cognitive Development, 25(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.03.003

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007). Pointing sets the stage for learning language—and creating language. Child Development, 78(3), 741–745.

Harley, T. A. (2008). The psychology of language: From data to theory. Psychology Press.

Holler, J., & Beattie, G. (2005). The role of iconic hand gestures in communication: Implications for the study of multimodal language. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29(4), 259–280. Holler, J., Shovelton, H., & Beattie, G. (2009). Do iconic hand gestures really contribute to the communication of semantic information in a face-to-face context? Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33(1), 73–88.

Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science, 16(5), 367–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01550.x

Kidd, E., & Holler, J. (2009). The role of gesture in communication and language development. Developmental Science, 12(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00754.x

Kreysa, H., Nunnemann, E. M., & Knoeferle, P. (2018). Distinct effects of different visual cues on sentence comprehension and later recall: The case of speaker gaze versus depicted actions. Acta Psychologica, 188, 220–229.

Macedonia, M., Müller, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). The impact of iconic gestures on foreign language word learning and its neural substrate. Human Brain Mapping, 32(6), 982–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.2108 Macedonia, M., & Von Kriegstein, K. (2012). A model of the neural mechanisms involved in gestural communication. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(6), 1174–1183. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00143

Mitchell, C., Wronski, C., Pauen, S., Daum, M. M., & Hoehl, S. (2019). Infants’ object processing is guided specifically by social cues. Neuropsychologia, 126, 54–61.

Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2019). Second language learning theories (4th ed.). Routledge.

Murgiano, M. P., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2021). The role of gesture in sentence processing and language learning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 36(3), 345–362.

Petten, C. V. (2006). Influence of semantic and syntactic context on spoken word processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(8), 1140–1157. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1140

Ping, R., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). The role of gesture in learning: Evidence from a study of gesture and speech. Cognition, 108(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.002

Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2005). Brain signatures of meaning access in action word recognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(37), 8258–8267. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1650-05.2005

Studdert-Kennedy, (M. 1993) The relation between spoken and signed language. Language and Speech, 36(1), 1–20.

Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675–735.

Von Kriegstein, K., & Macedonia, M. (2012). Neural mechanisms of gestural communication. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(6), 1132–1142. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00112

Downloads

Published

2024-10-07

How to Cite

Çuka, E. (2024). THE INVOLVEMENT OF BODY LANGUAGE TO HELP ALBANIAN STUDENTS UNDERSTAND, LEARN AND USE AMBIGUOUS WORDS CORRECTLY. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 66(2), 235–240. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/7023