FACTORS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AN EFFECTIVE INTERACTIVE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS ACCORDING TO THE REHABILITATION THERAPIST STUDENTS OF STARA ZAGORA MEDICAL COLLEGE
Keywords:
students, interactive learning, factors of interactive educational processAbstract
Modern college medical education has the mission of preparing health care professionals to meet society's medical care needs. The medical specialist's responsibility towards people's health has a primary role and is directly dependent on the training at the university. The young professional must not only receive and assimilate knowledge, but also form skills that he can competently apply in future practice. Teachers, for their part, are looking for a new model in education that adapts to modern reality. The change of the traditional meaning of an educational process is manifested through the constant implementation of innovative technological forms of learning, the goal of which is the creation of an interactive educational environment. The interactive educational process can be defined as a process that allows students to actively interact with the teacher, other students, and technology during learning. It is particularly important in the modern education system, where educational goals and teaching methods change over time. For the implementation of such a process, the influence of a number of factors. The purpose of this article is to study the opinion of rehabilitation students from Stara Zagora Medical College about the importance of the factors that influence the implementation of a productive interactive educational process. Material and methods: A survey was conducted among 85 students of the "Rehabilitator" specialty from Medical College - Stara Zagora at Thrace University from the first, second and third year. The principles of voluntariness and anonymity are respected. Statistical and mathematical methods were used for data processing. Results and discussion: The results show that 68.2% of students highly value the need for interactivity in the process of acquiring knowledge, professional skills and competences, and 76.5% believe that it should be applied together with traditional methods. Regarding the factors necessary for the implementation of an effective interactive educational process, the students consider the most important: the need for a material and technical base – 78,8%, followed by a sufficient number of hours for exercises 75,1%, the selection of methods and an average of 68,2% , motivation 63,5% and activity 61,17% of students and qualification of teachers 57,6%. A smaller percentage of future rehabilitators devote to working in small groups 52,9% and enough time for independent work 50,6%.
References
Божилова, В. (2015). Интерактивността в университетското образование и обучение, Годишник на Софийския университет „Св. Климент Охридски“, Книга Педагогика, Том 108, Университетско издателство „Климент Охродски“, 5-33.
Георгиева, С., & Тасинов, Т. (2020). Ключови фактори за компетентностна университетска подготовка на студенти–бъдещи учители. Годишник на ШУ „Епископ Константин Преславски “Педагогически факултет Т. ХXІV D, Шумен, 918–930//Georgieva, S., T. Tasinov (2020). Klyuchovi faktori za kompetentnostna, 918-930.
Гюрова, В. (2010). Интерактивните методи и мотивация на студентите за учене – в диалог Фил Рейс, Интерактивните методи в съвременното образование, Благоевград, 33-41.
Колева, И. (2013). Иновации в обучението по рехабилитация и въздействието им върху професионалните компетенции на кадрите, Автореферат, 2-3.
Костова, З., & Владимирова, Е. (2011). Интерактивно обучение: същност, трудности, теоретични основи и критични оценки, Стратегии на образователната и научната политика, 19(3), 203-238.
Сманцер, А. (2018). Теоретико-методологические аспекты личностноразвивающего взаимодействия субъектов образовательного процесса в классическом университете. – Във: Взаимодействие на преподавателя и студента в условията на университетското образование: традиции и иновации. Втора книга. Габрово, ЕКС-ПРЕС, 17 – 23.
Dudek, N. L., Marks, M. B., & Regehr, G. (2016). Failure to fail: the perspectives of clinical supervisors. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 8(3), 407-412.
Mollova, K. (2022). THЕ COMPЕTENCЕ АPPROACH IN THЕ TRАINING ОF THЕ FUTURЕ REHABILITATION THERAPIST. KNOWLEDGE-International Journal, 54(4), 713-717.
Nemati-Anaraki, L., Mousavi, S.S., AliBeyk, M., & Mahami-Oskouei, M. (2022). Medical students knowledge and use of smartphone-based applications. jha; 24 (4), 84-94. URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3875-en.html
Sullivan, G. M., Simpson, D., & Schumacher, M. (2018). Learning from SIMulated and standardized patients: essential knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Medical Teacher, 40(2), 158-162.
Tashkandi, E. (2021). E-Learning for Undergraduate Medical Students. Advances in medical education and practice, 12, 665–674. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S314509.
Teneva, P. (2021). EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS AND FORMATION OF KEY COMPETENCES IN THE EDUCATION OF MEDICAL LAB ASSISTANTS. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal, 47(4), 765–770. Retrieved from http://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/4851
Wutoh, A. K., Boren, S. A., Balas, E. A., & eKoh, E. J. (2017). Improving pharmacy student learning through effective feedback in a multimedia online learning environment. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(4), 6769.
