IMPACT OF CONTAMINATION (CLEANLINES) OF THE IMPLANT SURFACE -REVIEW PAPER

Authors

  • Ljupka Arsovski Faculty of Medical sciences, Goce Delcev University, Stip, North Macedonia
  • Sofija Carceva Salja Faculty of Medical sciences, Goce Delcev University, Stip, North Macedonia
  • Daniela Veleska – Stevkovska Faculty of Medical sciences, University,,Sv. Kiril i Metodij ‘’- Skopje, Macedonia

Keywords:

implants, materials, success, surface, types

Abstract

Dental implantology, as a part of dental medicine, is a modern science that deals with the placement of dental implants in a place where one or more teeth are missing, enabling the rehabilitation of the stomatognathic system, improving aesthetics, function, and occlusion. For this purpose, dental implants are used, from different manufacturers, with different shapes, diameters, sizes, and lengths. Important and desirable properties of the materials used for implant placement are: biocompatibility, bio inertness, bio functionality and bio adhesion. Implant companies always advertise a 95-99% success rate on their implants for their implantology system. Very rarely they talk about implant failure. The purpose of this paper is to indicate the influence of the implant surface modifications (the microtopography and micro design of the implants) on the osseointegration process success as well as the long-term success of the implant-prosthetic rehabilitation. There are differences between manufacturers in terms of materials and metal alloys they use in the implant production process, the type of surface of the implants, but also in the way they are cleaned and prevent possible contamination before they are put on sale. In this study, several types of implants, their surface characteristics, and the possible influence of contaminated implant surfaces on the success/failure of the implant were analyzed. To achieve the set goal, an electron microscope was used, which will allow a detailed analysis of the surface of the implants in three implant zones: apical, midline and implant neck. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) is a type of electron microscope that produces images of a sample by scanning its surface with a focused beam of electrons.

References

Adell, R. (1985). Tissue integrated prostheses in clinical dentistry. International dental journal, 35(4), 259–265.

Albrektsson, T., Brånemark, P. I., Hansson, H. A., & Lindström, J. (1981). Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica, 52(2), 155–170.

Chrcanovic, B. R., Albrektsson, T., & Wennerberg, A. (2015). Immediately loaded non-submerged versus delayed loaded submerged dental implants: a meta-analysis. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 44(4), 493–506.

Cobo-Vázquez, C., Reininger, D., Molinero-Mourelle, P., González-Serrano, J., Guisado-Moya, B., & López-Quiles, J. (2018). Effect of the lack of primary stability in the survival of dental implants. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 10(1), e14–e19.

Dohan Ehrenfest, D. M., Coelho, P. G., Kang, B. S., Sul, Y. T., & Albrektsson, T. (2010). Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography. Trends in biotechnology, 28(4), 198–206.

Junker, R., Dimakis, A., Thoneick, M., & Jansen, J. A. (2009). Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review. Clinical oral implants research, 20 Suppl 4, 185–206.

Le Guéhennec, L., Soueidan, A., Layrolle, P., & Amouriq, Y. (2007). Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 23(7), 844–854.

Ivanovski S., (2019), School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Oral Health Centre Herston, 288 Herston Road, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia

The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger (2022) Department of Oral Rehabilitation, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel

Pardal-Peláez, B., Flores-Fraile, J., Pardal-Refoyo, J. L., & Montero, J. (2021). Implant loss and crestal bone loss in early loading versus delayed and immediate loading in edentulous mandibles. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 13(4), e397–e405.

Walter, A., Winsauer, H., Marcé-Nogué, J., Mojal, S., & Puigdollers, A. (2013). Design characteristics, primary stability and risk of fracture of orthodontic mini-implants: pilot scan electron microscope and mechanical studies. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 18(5), e804–e810.

https://www.nidcr.nih.gov/health-info/oral-hygiene, 2023

Downloads

Published

2023-08-18

How to Cite

Arsovski, L., Carceva Salja, S., & Veleska – Stevkovska, D. (2023). IMPACT OF CONTAMINATION (CLEANLINES) OF THE IMPLANT SURFACE -REVIEW PAPER. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 59(4), 375–378. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/6227