TRANSFORMATIVE EFFECT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL EDUCATION IN UNIVERSITY LEARNING PROGRAMS ON ENTREPRENEURIAL SELF-EFFICACY

Authors

  • Zagorka Mitaseva University American College Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia

Keywords:

entrepreneurial education, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, learning programs, GUESSS

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate and investigate the transformative effects of entrepreneurial education within university learning programs, focusing specifically on its impact on entrepreneurial self-efficacy. As society continues to emphasize the importance of fostering an entrepreneurial mindset, understanding the mechanisms through which education influences self-efficacy becomes paramount. This research seeks to elucidate these connections, contributing valuable insights to the intersection of education and entrepreneurial development. Through an exploration of key concepts and empirical findings, this paper aims to highlight it the transformative potential of entrepreneurial education in enhancing students' belief in their ability to succeed in entrepreneurial endeavors.
The research instrument and sample selection were derived from the Global University Entrepreneurial Spirit Students (GUESSS), a global academic survey investigating entrepreneurial activities and associated attributes among university students. The survey data utilized in this study was sourced from the 2021 edition of GUESSS and involved a sample of 176 students drawn from three universities within the Republic of North Macedonia. The data collection, storage, and preparation processes were executed by the responsible GUESSS team (GUESSS, 2021).
The findings of this study reveal noteworthy outcomes concerning the impact of entrepreneurial education within university learning programs on entrepreneurial self-efficacy. On one hand, the research identified a substantial influence of the entrepreneurial program on enhancing entrepreneurial self-efficacy, specifically through heightened comprehension of entrepreneurial attitudes, values, and motivations. Additionally, an increased understanding of the requisite actions for initiating a business was observed. On the other hand, the investigation noted that the course and program exerted a positive influence on practical management skills, the capacity to cultivate networks, and the ability to identify opportunities among participating students.
Research findings on entrepreneurship education provide significant implications for practitioners, particularly regarding curriculum design and teaching methodologies particularly in the way they influence entrepreneurial self-efficacy among students. The insights gained from this study contribute to an understanding of how teaching can be strategically organized and how educators can be effectively trained to develop and implement relevant entrepreneurial offerings. Given the significant investment of time and resources associated with promoting and implementing entrepreneurship programs, a critical evaluation of the current knowledge base regarding the various outcomes of entrepreneurship education is imperative. This assessment not only informs future research endeavors, but also serves as a valuable benchmark for practitioners in the field. Moreover, the insights gained from the study inform the design of reward and motivation systems, not only in the context of entrepreneurial learning programs, but also within universities as key agents driving contemporary entrepreneurial activities. Such insights are crucial for predicting and recognizing the long-term outcomes of entrepreneurial ventures initiated in academia.

References

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

Barbosa, S., Gerhardt, M., & Kickul, J. (2007). The role of cognitive style and risk preference on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(4), 86-104.

Baum, J., & Locke, E. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 587-598.

Blank, S. G. (2013). The Four Steps to the Epiphany: Successful Strategies for Products that Win.

Chen, C., Greene, P. G., & Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 295–316.

Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles.

Drucker, P. (1993). The rise of the knowledge society. The Wilson Quarterly, 17(2), 52-71.

Drucker, P. (1986). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. Harper & Row, Vol. 1360 of Perennial Library.

Gibb, A. (2002). In pursuit of new ‘enterprise’ and ‘entrepreneurship’ paradigm for learning: Creative destruction, new values, new ways of doing things and new combinations of knowledge. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(3), 233–269.

Johannisson, B., (1991.) University training for entrepreneurship: A Swedish approach. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 3(1), 67–82.

Krueger, N., Brazeal, D.V., (1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 18(3), 91–104.

Krueger, N., & Dickson, P. R. (1994). How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Perceived self-efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences, 25(3), 385-400.

Liñán, F. (2008). Skill and value perceptions: How do they affect entrepreneurial intentions? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(3), 257–272.

Liu, H., Kulturel-Konak, S., & Konak, A. (2021). Key elements and their roles in entrepreneurship education ecosystem: Comparative review and suggestions for sustainability. Sustainability, 13(19), 10648.

Markman, G. D., Balkin, D. B., & Baron, R. A. (2002). Inventors and new venture formation: The effects of general self-efficacy and regretful thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13, 275-294.

Milesi, D., Petelski, N., & Verre, V. (2013). Innovation and appropriation mechanisms: Evidence from Argentine microdata. Technovation, 33(2), 78-87.

Mitaseva, Z. (2022). Entrepreneurial education influence on the development of self-efficacy and personal competency. Knowledge - International Journal, 55(6), 1181–1185.

Nikolaus Franke, Christian Lüthje. Entrepreneurial Intentions of Business Students: A Benchmarking Study. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2004, 1/3: 269-288.

Robinson, P., Stimpson, D.V., Huefner, J.C., Hunt, H.K., (1991). An attitude approach to the prediction of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 15(4), 13–31.

Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency.

Scholz, U., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 242-251.

Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management, 25(1), 217-226.

Scholz, U., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 242-251.

Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Simpson, E. S. C., & Weiner, J. A. (Eds.) (1989). The Oxford Encyclopaedic English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Souitaris V, Zerbinati S, Al-Laham A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566–591.

Stevenson, H.H., Jarillo, J.C., (1990) A paradigm of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal 11(4), 17–27.

Vaghely, I. P., & Julien, P. A. (2010). Are opportunities recognized or constructed? An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identification. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 73-86.

Wong, P.K., Ho, Y. P., & Singh, A., (2007). Towards an “entrepreneurial university” model to support knowledge- based economic development: The case of the National University of Singapore. World Development, 35(6), 941-958.

Zahra, S., & Dess, G. (2001). Entrepreneurship as a field of research, pp. 8-20.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285733221_The_impact_of_entrepreneurship_education_on_entrepreneurial_self-efficacy, 2024

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00869/full, 2024

https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2562, 2024

Downloads

Published

2024-02-15

How to Cite

Mitaseva, Z. (2024). TRANSFORMATIVE EFFECT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL EDUCATION IN UNIVERSITY LEARNING PROGRAMS ON ENTREPRENEURIAL SELF-EFFICACY. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 62(2), 217–223. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/6582