STUDY OF PRIMARY-AGED STUDENTS' EMPATHY THROUGH PROJECTIVE TEST

Authors

  • Nadezhda Kaloyanova University “Asen Zlatarov”, Bulgaria
  • Avi Abner University “Asen Zlatarov”, Bulgaria

Keywords:

Empathy, empathic response, projective test

Abstract

Empathy is considered a leading personal construct building emotional and social competence. It is a specific personal ability that is expressed in manifestations of understanding the feelings, emotions and experiences of others, but without entering their personal space and without making attempts to change their social or emotional background. A number of studies show that the purposeful development of empathy in childhood affects the entire future life and ensures individual prosperity. In order to better understand the manifestation and development of empathy in the personal context of the individual, the concept of empathic response was introduced in psychology.
The empathic response is a specific behavioural reaction that indicates the extent and manner in which a person identifies with a given situation and empathises with the sentiments of another. The ability to formulate an empathic response in a specific situation is one of the earliest skills a child must acquire to assure the development of empathy. The article presents a study on the ability of 9-to 10-year-old children to formulate empathic responses.A projective test developed according to J. Strayer's model was used for this purpose. Janet Strayer's model amalgamates the ability to comprehend foreign emotions and the experiences borne out of interaction with these emotions; the affective understanding of empathy, manifested as a closeness between the emotions felt by the self and the other, is revealed in unison with the involvement of cognitive processes. This outlines two planes of assessment: one of the proximities between the emotions experienced by the self and the other, and another of cognitive involvement, which shapes the content of the empathic response. 353 respondents were studied. The results are derived from statistical analysis and presented with qualitative and qualitative values.

References

Avlaev, O. U. (2023). Role of Empathy in Personality Maturation. Universal Journal on Innovative Education, Volume 2 Issue 3, Year 2023 ISSN: 2835-3048 https://univerpubl.com/index.php/semantic

Alzahrani, M. A., M. Alharb & Alodwani, A. A. (2019). The Effect of Social-Emotional Competence on Children Academic Achievement and Behavioral Development. International Education Studies, 12(12), pp. 14

Barriga, A. Q. (2000). Cognitive distortion and problem behaviors in adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29(3), 319-330.

Davis, M. H. (2018). Empathy: A social psychological approach. NY: Routledge (first pub. In 1996 by Westview Press)

Denham, S. A. (1998). Emotional Development in Young Children. NY: Guilford Press.

Decety, J., & Cowell, J. M. (2014). The complex relation between morality and empathy. Trends in cognitive sciences, 18(7), 337-339.

Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial Development. Handbook of Child Psychology, 5th ed., Vol. 3. New York: Wiley.

Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Sadovsky, A. (2006). Empathy-related responding in children. In M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.). Handbook of moral development (pp. 517–549).

Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Hoffman, M. L. (2008). Empathy and prosocial behavior. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. Feldman Barrett (Eds.). Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 440–455). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Eisenberg, N. (2010). Empathy-related responding: Links with self-regulation, moral judgment, and moral behavior. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 129–148). American Psychological Association.

McDonald, N.M. & Messinger, D.S. (2011). The development of empathy: How, when, and why. In: Empathy. NY: Springer

Мoran, D. (2001). Authority and estrangement: An essay on self-knowledge. Princeton University Press, 186.

Rogers, C. R., & Griswold, R. L. (2012). Freud and beyond: A history of modern psychoanalytic thought. Open Road Media, 121.

Walther,J.; Brewer, M. A.; Sochacka, N. W. Miller. S. E. (2019). Еmpathy and engineering formation. Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 109 (1), pp. 11-33

Xiaonan, K. (2018). Empathy and its implications for prosocial behavior and engagement with the arts. Indiana University Press

Стаматов, Р. (2016). Ролята на емпатията за моралното поведение. Българско Списание по Психология, 52(2-3), стр. 56-69

Стаматов, Р. (2000). Емпатията и нейното измерване при децата от предучилищна възраст и ранна училищна възраст. София: Веда Словена ЖГ, стр. 364-386

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666497623000176, 2023

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369480783_Empathy_at_school_project_Effects_of_didactics_of_emotionsR_on_emotional_competence_cortisol_secretion_and_inflammatory_profile_in_primary_school_children_A_controlled_longitudinal_psychobiological_st, 2023

https://rep.up.krakow.pl/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11716/2257/PM287--Studies-on-empathy--Klis--Kossewska.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, 2023

Downloads

Published

2024-02-15

How to Cite

Kaloyanova, N., & Abner, A. (2024). STUDY OF PRIMARY-AGED STUDENTS’ EMPATHY THROUGH PROJECTIVE TEST. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 62(2), 251–257. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/6587