NEW PERSPECTIVE OF BIOLOGICAL THERAPY IN TREATMENT OF AGERELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

Authors

  • Arsim Hajdari Faculty of medical sciences, Goce Delcev – University, Stip, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Nevenka Velickova Faculty of medical sciences, Goce Delcev - University Stip, Republic of North Macedonia

Keywords:

Anti-VEGF therapy, age-related macular degeneration, Brolucizumab

Abstract

Anti vascular endothelial growth factor (anti VEGF) therapy as a biological therapy has been introduced
in the treatment of retinal vascular and exudative diseases, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy,
retinal vein occlusion and myopic choroidal neovascularization. It involves repeated intravitreal injections of anti-
VEGF agents which are administered as solutions to achieve and maintain effective concentrations in the retina and
choroid. The aim of the study is to determine the efficacy of Brolucizumab as an anti-VEGF agent and therapy in
patients with wet macular degeneration, the duration of the drug's action, the frequency of injection and the length of
the therapy in addition to stopping the progression of the disease. The study has a retrospective-prospective
character and includes about 150 patients with wet macular degeneration who were treated and treated at the Italian
Eye Hospital in Pristina, Republic of Kosovo. Results: Before application of Brolucizumab, the visual acuity of this
group of patients ranged from 0.1 to 0.4. The majority of patients had a visual acuity of 0.1 - 130 (86.67%). Only 2
(1.33%) patients had a visual acuity of 0.4 before the treatment. After prescribing the first injection, the visual acuity
ranged from 0.1 to 0.6; 97(64.67%) patients had a visual acuity of 0.1, the maximum visual acuity of 0.6 was
registered in 3(2%) patients; 25(16.67%) patients had visual acuity 0.3, 21(14%) patients had visual acuity 0.2. After
prescribing the second injection, visual acuity ranged from 0.1 to 0.7; 67(44.67%) patients had visual acuity 0.1,
followed by individually equal number and percentage of patients with visual acuity 0.2 and 0.4 – 28(18.67%). The
maximum visual acuity of 0.7 was registered in 1(0.67%) patients. After the third injection of anti-VEGF, the most
frequently recorded visual acuity was 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4, obtained in 40(26.67%), 35(23.33%) and 33(22%) patients,
respectively; visual acuity of 0.5 and 0.6 had a similar number, i.e. percentage of patients – 11 (7.33%) and 10
(6.67%) patients. After the third injection, a maximum visual acuity of 0.8 was achieved in 2 (1.33%) patients. After
prescribing the last fourth injection, the visual acuity ranged from 0.1 to 0.8; patients after the completed treatment
mostly had visual acuity 0.4, - 35(23.33%), followed by visual acuity of 0.2 – 34(22.67%) patients; visual acuity of
0.3 and 0.5 had an individually identical proportion of patients – 22(14.67%); 17(11.33%) patients had a visual
acuity of 0.1, while the maximum visual acuity of 0.8 was registered in 2(1.33%) patients. Conclusion: Anti-VEGF
therapy in the form of injections placed directly into the eye stops the growth of abnormal blood vessels and reduces
the leakage of fluid into the surrounding tissues. In this way, swelling of the retina is reduced and vision is
improved.

References

Brandl C, Breinlich V, Stark KJ, et al. (2019). Features of age-related macular degeneration in the general adults and their dependency on age, sex, and smoking: results from the German KORA Study. PLoS ONE.11 e0167181. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Brandl C, Zimmermann ME, Günther F, et al. (2019). On the impact of different approaches to classify age-related macular degeneration: results from the German AugUR study. Sci Rep.8 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Colijn JM, Buitendijk GHS, Prokofyeva E, et al. (2019). Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in Europe: The past and the future. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:1753–1763. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Keenan TDL, Cukras CA & Chew EY. (2021). Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Epidemiology and Clinical Aspects. Adv Exp Med Biol.;1256:1-31. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-66014-7_1. PMID: 33847996.

Li JQ, Welchowski T, Schmid M, Mauschitz MM, Holz FG, Finger RP. (2019). Prevalence and incidence of age-related macular degeneration in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. bjophthalmol-2019-314422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Liisborg C. (2022). Age-related macular degeneration and myeloproliferative neoplasms - A common pathway. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;100 Suppl 271(Suppl 271):3-35. doi: 10.1111/aos.15247. PMID: 36200281; PMCID: PMC9828081

Mauschitz MM, Li JQ, Larsen PP, et al. (2019). Epidemiology of severe visual impairment and blindness of old people in Germany. Ophthalmologe;116:201–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Schuster AK, Wolfram C, Pfeiffer N, Finger RP. (2019). where do we stand?: an analysis of the treatment situation in Germany. Ophthalmologe. 2019;116:829–837. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Stein, P. et al. (2019, September). Retrieved from www.accessdata.fda.go

Thomas CJ, Mirza RG & Gill MK. Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Med Clin North Am. (2021) May;105(3):473-491. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Apr 2. PMID: 33926642

Wong WL, Su X, Li X, et al. (2019). Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2:e106–e116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Published

2024-10-07

How to Cite

Hajdari, A., & Velickova, N. (2024). NEW PERSPECTIVE OF BIOLOGICAL THERAPY IN TREATMENT OF AGERELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 66(4), 447–451. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/7053

Most read articles by the same author(s)