THE PROMOTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE ON SOCIAL MEDIA: ANALYSIS OF X/TWITTER

Authors

  • Ivan Blazhevski Institute for Sociological, Political and Juridical Research, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia Author

Keywords:

cultural heritage, cultural heritage institutions, social media, X/X/Twitter

Abstract

The development of information technologies and their global diffusion have caused radical changes in every sphere of life. The favoring of digital technologies was enhanced by the Internet, which evolved at an unprecedented speed. This trend was also reflected in the field of cultural heritage. In doing so, many programs have been designed and implemented that include the use of digital technology in promoting larger access to cultural heritage. One of the inevitable segments associated with the use of the Internet is social media. Social networks provide numerous opportunities, some of which are the exchange of opinions, socializing, gathering information and experiences on all topics. Even though the use of social media to spread knowledge about cultural heritage, as well as to effectively engage in dialogues for the preservation of cultural heritage has not been fully explored, still enabling communication between a large number of users, brings great potential for the promotion of cultural heritage.
This paper analyzes the representation of cultural heritage institutions in Macedonia on the X/X/Twitter social network. At the same time, in order to give a clear overview of the degree of their representation, their activities, the period of their access and last activity on X/X/Twitter, as well as the response of other users to their posts are analyzed. The performed analysis indicates that only a small number of cultural heritage institutions joined X/X/Twitter, while they were active only for a short period. Even though it may be necessary to revise their approach strategy on X/X/Twitter, such a situation indicates that the potential of cooperation with users, which would help in raising awareness of cultural heritage and its protection for generations to come, is not recognized between these institutions.

References

Borowiecki, K.J., Forbes, N. & Fresa, A. (Eds.) (2016). Cultural Heritage in a Changing World. Springer Open.

Dann, S. (2015). X/Twitter Data Acquisition and Analysis: Methodology and Best Practice. In Burhalter, J. & Wood, N. (Eds) Maximizing Commerce and Marketing Strategies through Micro-Blogging, Business Science Reference, 2015

European Commission. (2023, March 23). The Europeana platform. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/europeana

e-Europe (2001) European content in global networks. Coordination mechanisms for digitalization programmes. Action plan on coordination of digitalisation programmes and policies. Follow up of Experts meeting, Lund, Sweden, 4 April 2001. https://www.iccu.sbn.it/export/sites/iccu/documenti/lund_action_plan-en.pdf

IFLA (2002). Guidelines for digitization projects for collections and holdings in the public domain, particularly those held by libraries and archives. https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/preservation-and-conservation/publications/digitization-projects-guidelines.pdf

Gaitan, M. (2014). Cultural heritage and social media. e-dialogos Annual digital journal on research in Conservation and Cultural Heritage, 4, 38-45.

Ginzarly, M., & Teller, J. (2020). Online communities and their contribution to local heritage knowledge. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development. 11(4) https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-02-2020-0023

Liang, X., Lu, Y., & Martin, J. (2021). A Review of the Role of Social Media for the Cultural Heritage. Sustainability. 13(3), https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031055

Kvan, T. (2008). Conclusion: A future for the past. In Kalay, Y., Kvan, T. & Affleck, J. (Eds.). New Heritage: New media and cultural heritage. Routledge

Russo, A. & Watkins, J. (2007). Digital Cultural Communication: Audience and Remediation. In Fiona Cameron, F. & Kenderdine, S. (Eds.). Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse. MIT Press

Statista. (2023, March 7). Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2023 ranked by number of monthly active users. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/

Statista. (2023, March 5). Number of social media users worldwide from 2017 to 2027. https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/

UNESCO. (2022). Basic Texts of the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/2003_Convention_Basic_Texts-_2022_version-EN_.pdf

UNESCO. (1972). Convention Concerning the Protection of World Cultural and Natural Heritage. https://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdf

UNESCO. (2020). Convention for the protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict with regulations for the execution of the convention. https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/1954_Convention_EN_2020.pdf

UNESCO. (2011). Digital Library Manifesto of the International Federationof Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000212534

UNESCO. (2003). Guidelines for the Preservation of Digital Heritage. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000130071

UNESCO. (2023, April 10). What is Intangible Cultural Heritage? https://ich.unesco.org/en/what-is-intangible-heritage-00003

Weller, K., Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Mahrt, M., & Puschmann, C. (Eds.). (2014). X/Twitter and Society. Peter Lang Publishing

Downloads

Published

2024-04-10

How to Cite

THE PROMOTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE ON SOCIAL MEDIA: ANALYSIS OF X/TWITTER. (2024). KNOWLEDGE PROCEEDINGS, 44(1), 15-19. https://ikm.mk/proceedings/index.php/kp/article/view/2